Value Based Healthcare Estimation Values for Benchmarking Among Spanish Hospitals for Five Integrated-Practice Units
Author(s)
Gimenez E1, Hidalgo T2, Cots F3, Borras P4, Regis L5, Fornaguera M5, Cossio Y6, Value Based Evaluation Club B7
1Benchmarking Sanitario 3.0, Barcelona, Spain, 2Benchmarking Sanitario 3.0, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 3Hospital del Mar-CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain, 4Consorci Sanitari Catalunya, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 5Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 6Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, 7BS3 Value-Based Evaluation Club, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Describe a methodological proposal and five value-based ratio estimations based in real-world Spanish hospital care episodes, to serve as a reference platform to discuss and achieve value-based healthcare benchmarking.
METHODS: Patient Reported Experience and Outcome Measures (PREM+PROM) data was collected (January-June 2023) 6 months after Knee and Hip Prostheses surgery (set-KP, set-HP), as well as Heart Failure (set-HF) in-hospital admissions in 31 Spanish hospitals. Similar data was collected (February-April 2024) 4 months after programmed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies (set-LCh) and Oncological Prostatectomies (set-OPr) in 23 Spanish hospitals (including retrospective questions on basal pre-surgery quality of life). PRE-data was based on CAHPS (2022) and Picker (2024) questionnaires, and PROs main source were ICHOM recommendations. All questionnaires scorings were re-scaled into 0-to-100 and averaged to get “value-based-units (VbU)” (each questionnaire counted equal). Costs data was calculated considering each patients’ episode profile with Machine-Learning and the Spanish Net of Hospital Costs database, based on 5 millions of hospital-per-episode costs and 10 partial-cost vectors. Crude PROMs scorings were compared across centers in each set. Costs were divided by PRM values for independent reference benchmark ratios splitting by size and public/private hospital status.
RESULTS: The ratios were based on 804 patients (set-KP), 729 (set-HP), 717 (set-HF), 952 (set-LCh) and 388 (set-OPr) patients. Cost per Value-Units were: 101€/VbU big public-84 medium public-89 private hospitals (set-KP), 110€/VbU-97-86 (set-HP), 102€/VU-46-59 (set-HF), 12€/VU-16-13 (set-LCh) and 68€/VU-56-62 (set-OPr). The higher variability (set-HF) was not associated to outcomes but to differential costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Value-based care invites to work for excellence care analyzing the variability in costs and relevant-to-patient self-reported measures. Methods and consensus evolved and many are still to overcome such like working with final-process outcomes without always considering basal. Nevertheless, the presented results prove the feasibility to approach practical reference benchmarking values.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)
Code
PCR213
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Performance-based Outcomes, PRO & Related Methods
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders (including MI, Stroke, Circulatory), Gastrointestinal Disorders, Musculoskeletal Disorders (Arthritis, Bone Disorders, Osteoporosis, Other Musculoskeletal), No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology
Explore Related HEOR by Topic