Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Active Implant for Chronic Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease in Spain

Author(s)

Harper S1, Bui KH2, Mealing S1, Sánchez López D3, Priego Jiménez P4, Moreno Sanz C5
1York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK, 2Implantica, LONDON, LON, UK, 3Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Madrid, Spain, 4Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain, 5Hospital General La Mancha Centro, Ciudad Real, Spain

OBJECTIVES: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) remains highly prevalent in Europe. In Spain, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the standard medical treatment, and Nissen fundoplication, the standard-of-care surgical treatment. The RefluxStop device is an emerging surgical alternative. This analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of RefluxStop comparing against PPIs and Nissen fundoplication.

METHODS: A Markov model to assess cost-effectiveness of RefluxStop versus other treatments was adapted based on a recent publication for the UK National Health Service. The model adopted the healthcare payer's perspective of Spain, using a one-month cycle length, a lifetime horizon, and a 3% annual discount rate. The health states comprised PPI use, PPI relapse, follow-on surgery, reoperation, increased-dose PPI, Barrett's oesophagus, oesophageal cancer, and death. Adverse events associated with PPIs and surgery were incorporated; benefits were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Unit costs were derived from Spanish diagnostic-related group (DRG) tariffs and medical literature. Clinical efficacy data were sourced from published literature. Uncertainty was explored through probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon, the cost difference for RefluxStop versus PPIs and Nissen fundoplication was EUR 1,472 and EUR 2,111 per person, and the difference in QALYs gained per patient was 2.64 and 0.88, respectively. Using the base case, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for RefluxStop compared to standard care were EUR 557 per QALY gained against PPIs and EUR 2,393 per QALY gained against Nissen. Taking a cost-effectiveness threshold of EUR 30,000 per QALY gained, the likelihood of RefluxStop being cost-effective was high, with a probability of 100% against PPIs and 95% against Nissen fundoplication. The model results remained robust on sensitivity analysis. Analysis using a 10-year time horizon showed that RefluxStop remained cost-effective compared to standard of care.

CONCLUSIONS: RefluxStop treatment for GORD is highly likely a cost-effective surgical option in Spain.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

EE437

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation, Medical Devices

Disease

Gastrointestinal Disorders, Medical Devices, Surgery

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×