Methodological Approaches to Assess Cost-Effectiveness Using Pathway Models in Oncology

Author(s)

Beggs L1, Sadek A2, Lokuge K3, Claxton L4, Welton NJ2
1National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, CHE, UK, 2University of Bristol, Bristol, BST, UK, 3National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, UK, 4National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK

OBJECTIVES: The NICE technology appraisals programme commissioned the development of a pathways model to explore cost-effectiveness of interventions in non-small cell lung cancer. Pathways models incorporate multiple decision nodes in a treatment sequence. To inform the model structure, we conducted a review to identify methodologies used to evaluate cost-effectiveness of interventions in pathways disease modelling within oncology.

METHODS: A search was designed to identify papers on methodological approaches to oncology pathway modelling. Systematic reviews were included if they provided a critique of methodological approaches. The search terms included pathways models, core/core disease and whole disease models. We also ran a supplementary update review of Lewis et al. to identify studies on methods for evidence synthesis to inform pathways models.

RESULTS: 8 full texts were included on modelling methodology, with best practice recommendations extracted and summarised. Key themes identified included: a preference for patient-level model structures; preference for data coming from a single source; choice of software; terminology; potential for further research into methods for developing pathways models when optimal data is not available. 5were included in the supplementary review of evidence synthesis methods. Methods included: analysis of combined individual patient datasets, separate parametric models at each line of therapy, and multi-state network meta-analysis with flexible survival models.

CONCLUSIONS: Existing methodological papers exploring pathways model development outlines a process for developing pathway models, emphasise the need for individual patient data and data from a single source. However, there is value in further methods development allowing for the inclusion of multiple data sets limited to published data whilst adhering to the processes outlined in the literature. Multi-state network meta-analysis with flexible survival models was most appropriate for evidence synthesis for pathways models. However it may be necessary to conduct separate syntheses at each line of therapy due to data limitations.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

MSR22

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Methodological & Statistical Research, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Decision Modeling & Simulation, Literature Review & Synthesis

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×