Treatment Patterns of Advanced Egfr-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in Latin America

Author(s)

Alves JS1, Watanabe de Oliveira R1, Oliveira D2, Medina Y3, Osorio M4, Tabares M5, Tamayo C6, Kano B7, Muller Bernz I7
1Janssen-Cilag Farmacêutica Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Johnson & Johnson Medical Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil, 3Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Bogotá D.C, CUN, Colombia, 4IQVIA, Mexico City, DF, Mexico, 5IQVIA, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, B, Argentina, 6IQVIA, Bogotá, CUN, Colombia, 7IQVIA, São Paulo, Brazil

OBJECTIVES: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a common and lethal cancer. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a frequent mutation in NSCLC associated with a high clinical and economic burden for healthcare systems. There is an evidence need on characterizing treatment patterns and unmet needs in LATAM to support decision-making. The aim of this study is to describe treatment patterns of advanced EGFR+ NSCLC patients in four Latin American countries (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Mexico).

METHODS: a pragmatic literature review was conducted to identify evidence on treatment patterns, local guidelines, and resource use for EGFR+ NSCLC. After that, 40 double-blinded, semi-structured, online interviews (10 per country) were conducted with key opinion leaders to collect information on treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) for advanced EGFR+ NSCLC across different treatment lines. The individual values were consolidated for the analysis.

RESULTS: osimertinib was the preferred first-line option for advanced EGFR+ NSCLC (31,2 – 76,9%) in all countries, followed by gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib. Upon disease progression with osimertinib, a wide range of therapeutic options have been reported, but those were mostly comprised of chemotherapy associated, or not, with immunotherapy. Targeted-therapies were not as frequent in subsequent lines in these countries, as in first-line. Regarding biomarker diagnosis, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been reported as the most used technology in Brazil (84,4%) and Colombia (72,5%) while PCR was most recurrent in Argentina (51%) and Mexico (81%), all primarily funded by industry-sponsored programs.

CONCLUSIONS: information on the use of targeted-therapies in first and second-line treatment for the management of EGFR+ NSCLC is critical for decision makers, due to the high impact on health outcomes and impact on the patients' quality of life. Increased access to new targeted-therapies in both first and subsequent lines, as well as NGS technology are a relevant unmet need in EGFR+ NSCLC.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

SA56

Topic

Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Surveys & Expert Panels

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×