A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab as Adjuvant Treatment Following Complete Resection and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Adult Patients With Early-Stage Non‑Small Cell Lung Cancer With a High Risk of Recurrence

Author(s)

Silva Miguel L1, Pinheiro B1, Carvalho P2, Jovanoski N3, Belleli R3, Abogunrin S3, Alves P4, Araújo A5, Barata F6, Hespanhol V7, da Luz R8, Borges M9
1IQVIA Portugal, Salvo, Oeiras, 13, Portugal, 2IQVIA Portugal, Lisboa, Portugal, 3F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, BS, Switzerland, 4Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal, 5Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal, 6Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 7Centro Hospitalar Universitário de S. João, Porto, Portugal, 8Centro Hospitalar e Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal, 9Laboratório de Farmacologia Clínica e Terapêutica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab as adjuvant treatment, compared to best supportive care (BSC), following complete resection and platinum-based chemotherapy in adult patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at high risk of recurrence, whose tumors have programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50%, excluding epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant or anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive NSCLC.

METHODS: A Markov model including disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence, metastatic recurrence (1st and 2nd lines), and death health states was used. The model uses data from IMpower010 (atezolizumab’s pivotal trial in this therapeutic indication) for DFS and from external sources for the remaining health states. As patient reported outcomes were not collected during IMpower010, utility scores are based on the literature and on IMpower150. The use of this trial, in which atezolizumab was evaluated in metastatic NSCLC patients, allowed estimating EQ-5D-3L scores with Portuguese tariffs for the respective health states and standardizing the scores available from the literature. Portuguese-specific disease management resource use was based on an experts panel and Portuguese diagnosis-related group microdata. The main sources for unit costs were national legislation and official drug cost databases. The analysis was conducted from the National Health Service perspective, assuming a lifetime horizon and a 4% discount rate. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses show that results are robust.

RESULTS: Atezolizumab increases average life expectancy by 2.25 discounted life years (LY) or 1.64 discounted quality adjusted life years (QALY), with an incremental cost of 11,732€ that is due to higher treatment costs in DFS. The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) are 5,212€ per LY and 7,139€ per QALY. Deterministic sensitivity analyses show that results are robust.

CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with atezolizumab allows for an increase of LY and QALY compared to BSC, with an ICER that is usually considered cost-effective in the Portuguese setting.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

EE78

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Biologics & Biosimilars, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×