Empirical vs Documented Use of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for the Treatment of Complicated Infections in French Hospital Settings
Author(s)
Mootien J1, Akrich B2, Bourge X2, Boutoille D3, Brassac I2, Castan B4, Mackosso C5, Monteiro Tavares L6, Ruiz F6, Timsit JF7, Ruimy R8
1CHU Mulhouse, Mulhouse, France, 2MSD France, Puteaux, France, 3CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France, 4CH Périgueux, Périgueux, France, 5MSD France, PUTEAUX , France, 6ClinSearch, Malakoff, France, 7AP-HP Bichat, Paris, France, 8CHU Nice, Nice, France
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: This prospective, multicentre, French observational study was set up to describe the conditions and outcomes of ceftolozane/tazobactam (TOL/TAZ) use in hospital settings.
METHODS: Adults who received at least one dose of TOL/TAZ were eligible for inclusion. Enrolled patients were treated according to standard of care and followed up until stop of TOL/TAZ. Prescription was either documented, following the results of the antibiogram, or empirical.
RESULTS:
A total of 260 patients were enrolled between October 2018 and December 2019. Mean age was 56.8 years, 67.3% were males, and 81% presented with multi-drug resistant bacteria at inclusion. TOL/TAZ prescription was documented for 68% (N=177) of patients. Most documented cases (77.4%) received other treatment lines prior to TOL/TAZ. Carbapenems (25.5%), cephalosporins (18.2%), and penicillins (16.1%) were the most frequently prescribed single treatments, immediately prior to TOL/TAZ. Inversely, 27.7% of empirical patients received prior treatment, mostly carbapenems (34.8%) as single line immediately prior to TOL/TAZ. Moreover, 40.7% and 67.5% of documented and empirical patients respectively received concomitant antibiotic lines. Most were initiated at the same time as TOL/TAZ (69.4% and 80.4% for documented vs empirical patients). In both groups, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and lipo/glycopeptides were the most frequently prescribed. Median duration of TOL/TAZ treatment was 16.1 days (1–115, N=176) vs 14.8 days (2–93, N=83) for documented vs empirical therapy. Reported reasons for TOL/TAZ discontinuation in documented vs empirical cases were: complete cure (63.8% vs 28.9%), partial cure (7.9% vs 41%), adaptation to microbiological results (11.3% vs 13.3%), death (4.0% vs 2.4%), treatment failure (2.8% vs 6%), adverse event (1.7% vs 3.6%), and other (8.5% vs 4.8%).CONCLUSIONS: Treatment failures were low, irrespective of prescription type. Based on these results, TOL/TAZ can be considered an effective option for the treatment of complicated bacterial infections in healthcare settings.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
CO127
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Performance-based Outcomes
Disease
STA: Drugs