Safety and Efficacy of Augmentation Therapy in Patients with Alpha-1-Antitrypsin Deficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author(s)

Singh B1, Rai P2, Bisht G2, Sharma A2
1Pharmacoevidence Pvt. Ltd., SAS Nagar Mohali, PB, India, 2Pharmacoevidence Pvt. Ltd., SAS Nagar, Mohali, India

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is an underdiagnosed genetic condition characterised by reduced level of alpha-1 antitrypsin enzyme which predisposes individuals to lung, liver, or other systemic diseases. Augmentation therapy (AT) is the only licensed treatment for patients with AATD associated lung diseases. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of approved AT in AATD.

METHODS: An SLR was conducted from database inception to May 2022 by searching three major biomedical databases to identify relevant randomized control trials (RCT) evaluating AT versus placebo in AATD patients. References of identified SLR/meta-analyses were investigated to identify additional studies. The SLR followed two review and a quality control process for screening and extractions. The risk of bias assessment was performed using Cochrane’s RoB-2 tool.

RESULTS: The SLR identified 9 RCTs assessing AT in AATD, of which only 3 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The RCTs contributing to meta-analysis varied regarding the trial duration, ranging from two to three years. ATs were associated with significantly better efficacy compared to placebo regarding the annual deterioration in lung density (random-effects, Sidik-Jonkman model, mean difference [MD]: 0.79; 95%CI: 0.29 to 1.28). The other analysed efficiency outcomes (annual FEV1% predicted and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide) were comparable (non-significant) between AT and placebo. In terms of safety outcomes i.e., any adverse events (AE), any serious AEs, and upper respiratory tract infections, the results of meta- analysis were also comparable between AT and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS: The SLR and meta-analysis highlight the favourable efficacy of AT for the treatment of AATD in terms of lung density, indicating reduction in emphysema progression. The evidence base for AT in AATD is scarce, hence, more studies examining AT are warranted for the treatment of adult patients with AATD.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

CO36

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Literature Review & Synthesis, Meta-Analysis & Indirect Comparisons

Disease

SDC: Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity), SDC: Rare & Orphan Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×