Cost-Utility Analysis of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Children and Adolescents in Portugal
Author(s)
Silva C1, Paiva Lopes MJ2, Cruz M3, Ramos L4, Santiago F5, Faria M6, Rocha-Gonçalves FN6
1Instituto de Saúde Baseada na Evidência, Lisboa, Portugal, 2Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal, 3Centro hospitalar e Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal, 4Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 5Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal, 6Sanofi, Lisboa, Portugal
OBJECTIVES: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, systemic, type-2 inflammatory disease caused by an increased production/signaling of IL-4/IL-13 associated with long-term negative effects and variable disease course. Dupilumab is the first-in-class targeted therapy (anti-IL4/IL-13) approved and reimbursed in Portugal for the treatment of children/adolescent with AD. We aimed to evaluate cost-utility of dupilumab versus best supportive care (BSC) in children/adolescents (6-17 years) with severe AD candidates for systemic therapy in Portugal.
METHODS: We developed a decision tree followed by Markov model with treatment response evaluated at week 16 and 52 (improvement of at least 50% in EASI and at least 6 points in DLQI): responders stay on treatment; non-responders discontinue to BSC. Effectiveness was derived from double-blind RCT. EQ-5D-3L trial data was converted to utilities based on Portuguese tariffs. Direct medical costs (drug acquisition/administration, disease management, adverse events) were based on literature, expert opinion and official sources. Base-case analysis assumed Portuguese NHS perspective, no cost with BSC, patients followed until 18 years-old, 4% discount rate in costs and consequences. Costs were expressed in 2021 euros. Sensitivity analyses were performed including impact on caregiver’s quality of life.
RESULTS: Over a time-horizon of up to 18 years-old, dupilumab was more effective than BSC leading to a gain of +1.28 QALY at an additional overall cost of €34,827/patient (€2,900/patient/year). Drug acquisition cost was modestly offset by less need of other healthcare resources. Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was €27,303 per QALY gained. When including impact of severe AD in caregiver’s quality of life, ICUR decreases to €21,363.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that dupilumab is cost-effective versus BSC in treating severe AD in children/adolescents considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000/QALY gained. Dupilumab may free up some healthcare resources for other diseases. Impact of severe AD in caregivers reinforces cost-effectiveness of dupilumab in this young population.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
EE13
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision & Deliberative Processes, Reimbursement & Access Policy
Disease
STA: Biologics & Biosimilars, STA: Drugs