FLT3 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Author(s)
Santos A1, Pereira C1, Freitas D2
1Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2Universidade José do Rosário Vellano (UNIFENAS-BH), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To compare FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) with salvage therapy or other FLT3i for relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients.
METHODS: This is a systematic review with direct meta-analyses. Structured searches were conducted on Medline (via PubMed), Lilacs/Ibecs (via BVS), and Embase. Additionally, a complementary search was conducted to guarantee sensitivity. Studies that compared a FLT3i with salvage therapy or other FLT3i for the treatment of AML in patients with FLT3 mutation were selected. The meta-analyses were conducted through the inverse variance method and the random-effects models were calculated by the DerSimonian and Laird method. Hazard ratios (HR) and relative risks (RR) were reported with their 95% confidence interval (95%CI), depending on the nature of the outcome. The methodological quality was assessed with the RoB 2 scale and the quality of evidence was estimated through the GRADE method. The protocol of this research is available in PROSPERO (CRD42022324118).
RESULTS: Three studies that compared FLT3i with salvage therapy were selected. The FLT3i were considered superior to salvage therapy in terms of overall survival (HR=0.67, 95%CI=0.57-0.79, valor-p<0.01), event-free survival (HR=0.74, 95%CI=0.56-0.99, p-value=0.04), hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation during treatment (RR=2.12, 95%CI=1.28-3.49, p-value<0.01), composite complete response (RR=2.17, 95%CI=1.74-2.73, p-value<0.01) and overall response rate (RR=2.43, 95%CI=1.97-3.00, p-value<0.01). There are safety issues, though. Serious adverse events were much more common with FLT3i than with salvage therapy (RR=1.76, 95%CI=1.09-2.83). The quality of evidence varied between very low and moderate, but the overall assessment suggests a recommendation strong in favor of the technology.
CONCLUSIONS: The FLT3i seem to be efficacious for the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. There is some preoccupation regarding the much higher risk of serious adverse events in this group. Nevertheless, the benefits seem to compensate the risks.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
MT1
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Literature Review & Synthesis, Meta-Analysis & Indirect Comparisons
Disease
SDC: Oncology