Matching-Adjusted Indirect Treatment Comparisons (MAIC) of the Effect of Lorlatinib Versus Chemotherapy on Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) for Patients with Second-LINE or Later Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Pos ...
Author(s)
Smith S1, Albuquerque de Almeida F2, Inês M2, Iadeluca L3, Cooper M1
1BresMed Health Solutions, Sheffield, UK, 2Pfizer Portugal, Porto Salvo, Portugal, 3Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA
OBJECTIVES : To compare the relative efficacy of the ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) lorlatinib, investigated in the single-arm Phase I/II trial B7461001 as a second-line or later treatment for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, to chemotherapy, a key comparator within this indication. METHODS : A clinical systematic literature review (SLR) performed in February 2017 (updated February 2018) identified two relevant studies with PFS data (ALUR and ASCEND-5) investigating chemotherapy treatments (pemetrexed or docetaxel). MAICs were performed (matching on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status [ECOG PS], race, gender, and brain metastases) using the pooled pseudo-PFS data for chemotherapy and the lorlatinib patient cohorts previously treated with at least two ALK-TKIs or one ALK-TKI other than crizotinib. For OS, MAICs were performed using a retrospective study (Ou 2014), although there are substantial limitations with this evidence source. An SLR update in February 2020 identified a retrospective study (Lin 2019) with PFS data for platinum-based chemotherapy. An MAIC matching on age, race, gender and brain metastases (Lin 2019 did not report ECOG PS) compared lorlatinib to platinum-based chemotherapy. RESULTS : Lorlatinib was consistently associated with a significant decrease in the hazard of progression versus all types of chemotherapy assessed. For the original comparison to docetaxel and pemetrexed, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.44) and the naïve HR was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.27-0.47). For comparison to platinum-based chemotherapy the adjusted HR was 0.40 (95% CI: 0.29-0.55); the naïve HR was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.23-0.57). Lorlatinib provided a significant decrease in hazard of death versus chemotherapy; with HRs ranging from 0.30 (95% CI: 0.18-0.50) to 0.43 (95% CI: 0.27-0.60). CONCLUSIONS : Lorlatinib consistently demonstrated a significant improvement in the outcomes of both PFS and OS when compared with chemotherapy, although the evidence base is limited.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)
Code
PCN41
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Methodological & Statistical Research
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Oncology