Comparative Efficacy of Filgotinib Versus Alternative Treatments for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients with an Inadequate Response to Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Author(s)
Jacob I1, Beresford L1, Butler K1, McNamara B1, Dennis J1, Hayward O1, Turner M1, Sadler S1, Sugrue D1, Gordon J2, Radford M3, Gharaibeh M4, LU X5
1Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, UK, 2Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Birmingham, UK, 3Gilead Sciences Europe Ltd, Uxbridge, UK, 4Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA, 5Galapagos NV, Mechelen, Belgium
OBJECTIVES: For rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who have an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), treatment options include switching to another bDMARD or to newer targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs). Filgotinib, a tsDMARD which selectively inhibits JAK1, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in the FINCH2 trial. Our objective was to perform a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of filgotinib + conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDS) to alternative treatments in moderate-severe RA patients with an inadequate response to bDMARDs (bDMARD-IR). METHODS: Studies reporting American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response were systematically identified and selected for NMA. To estimate the relative efficacy of the therapies, a Bayesian hierarchical NMA was performed using a fixed effects single-model approach that considers ACR response as a single endpoint, rather than split by ACR20/50/70 criteria. Comparative efficacies were reported as median values with 95% credible intervals (CrI) on the probit scale (non-significant results overlap 0). RESULTS: A total of 11 trials, were eligible for NMA. Based on ACR response, all bDMARD and tsDMARD were found to be highly efficacious compared to csDMARDs. Filgotinib + csDMARDs (hereinafter referred to as filgotinib) significantly outperformed csDMARDs alone at 12 weeks (100mg: 0.6261; 0.3681 – 0.8942; 200mg: 0.881; 0.623 – 1.147), and 24 weeks (100mg: 0.5486; 0.2875 – 0.818; 200mg: 0.912; 0.645 – 1.183). Filgotinib (200mg) demonstrated statistically significant superiority over sarilumab + csDMARDs (150mg q2w) in ACR response at 12 weeks (0.3723; CrI 0.012 – 0.723). When comparing bDMARDs/tsDMARDs to each other, no intervention was significantly more effective at either 12 or 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Filgotinib is more effective than csDMARDs and has a similar efficacy to other treatments in bDMARD-IR patients. Filgotinib provides another efficacious option for patients who may need to switch from a typical biologic to the newer JAK inhibitor class.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)
Code
PMS5
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Musculoskeletal Disorders