Author(s)
Serrão R1, Mansinho K2, Maltez F3, Marques N4, Carvalho A5, Pazos R6, Zagalo A7, Méndez J8, Neves I9, Oliveira J10, Pacheco P11, Abreu RC9, Miranda AC12, Paixão L2, Camacho AP2, Almeida/Joana JCA13, Ferreira J2
1Hospital de S. João, Porto, Portugal, 2Merck Sharp & Dohme Lda, Paço de Arcos, Portugal, 3Hospital de Curry Cabral, Lisbon, Portugal, 4Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal, 5Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal, 6Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Algarve, Portimão, Portugal, 7Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal, 8Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal, 9ULS Matosinhos, Matosinhos, Portugal, 10CHUC, Coimbra, Portugal, 11Hospital Fernando da Fonseca, Amadora, Portugal, 12Hospital de Egas Moniz, Lisbon, Portugal, 13MSD Lda, Paço de Arcos, Portugal
OBJECTIVES: REALITY was a non-interventional, retrospective and multi-centre study, aiming to describe the clinical and sociodemographic features of HIV patients initiating Raltegravir (RAL) (bid)-based regimens, in Portugal. A secondary objective was to assess the satisfaction of patients with RAL at the study inclusion visit, according to a self-reported questionnaire (HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire- status version, HIVTSQs (© Bradley). METHODS: The study included naïve and treatment-experienced adult patients infected with HIV-1, who initiated treatment with RAL during 2015-2017, from 11 Portuguese hospitals. The information on the patient’s treatment satisfaction with RAL was collected using a linguistically validated Portuguese version of the HIVTSQs, completed at the study inclusion visit by patients on RAL. This 10-item questionnaire was divided in two subscales (General Satisfaction/Clinical and Lifestyle/Ease) each with scores ranging from 0-30 where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. All 10 items were summed to produce the treatment satisfaction score (range: 0-60 points): higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with the treatment. RESULTS:A total of 244 patients, out of 302 recruited between Jul2018-Apr2019, were on RAL-based regimens at the inclusion visit, and therefore filled the HIVTSQs©. Patients on RAL-based regimens reported a high satisfaction with Raltegravir-based treatment, with mean scores of 28.1 points for General Satisfaction/Clinical and 27.3 points for Lifestyle/Ease. The mean total score for overall Treatment Satisfaction was 55.4 points. This total score was higher for women than for men (56.27 vs. 55.09, respectively; p=0.0191). No differences were observed regarding Treatment Satisfaction score between those with late diagnosis vs non-late diagnosis and between CDC stage. Also, no statistically significant differences were observed when considering the other quantitative variables tested. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment satisfaction with Raltegravir-based regimens was high, which has been shown to be associated with better treatment adherence and might be expected to result in fewer patients discontinuing therapy.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)
Code
PIN1
Topic
Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Disease Management, Hospital and Clinical Practices, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, PRO & Related Methods
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)