Real-World Evidence in European Orphan Drug Submissions and the Impact on Reimbursement Success
Author(s)
Sarah Smart, MSc1, Oliver Webb, MBiochem2, Adelaide Shaw, MSc3, Andrew Mumford, BSc4.
1Initiate Consultancy, Alderton, United Kingdom, 2Initiate Consultancy, London, United Kingdom, 3Initiate Consultancy, Towcester, United Kingdom, 4Initiate Consultancy, Northampton, United Kingdom.
1Initiate Consultancy, Alderton, United Kingdom, 2Initiate Consultancy, London, United Kingdom, 3Initiate Consultancy, Towcester, United Kingdom, 4Initiate Consultancy, Northampton, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: This study retrospectively analysed health technology assessments (HTAs) submitted in 2024, to evaluate differences in the approval of orphan versus non-orphan drugs across selected European countries. Specifically, examining the extent to which submissions for orphan drugs incorporated real-world evidence (RWE) and whether its inclusion was associated with a higher likelihood of receiving a positive reimbursement recommendation.
METHODS: HTAs published in 2024 in 7 European countries were screened and categorised as orphan or non-orphan, with outcomes analysed to evaluate the likelihood of HTA success according to orphan-designation and use of orphan-specific reimbursement processes. The HTA documents for all orphan products were subsequently screened for the inclusion of RWE, determined by targeted searches for RWE-related terminology and common real-world data sources. HTA outcomes were then comparatively analysed to examine if the inclusion of RWE was associated with a higher likelihood of successful reimbursement.
RESULTS: In total, 1040 reimbursement decisions were included in the analysis: orphan (n=285) and non-orphan (n=755). For countries with orphan-specific routes, likelihood of a positive outcome was 87% for orphan drugs versus 66% for non-orphan drugs. Whereas for countries without separate orphan processes, this was 76% for orphan drugs versus 78% for non-orphan drugs. After de-duplication, 195 HTA submissions for orphan drugs were screened for the inclusion of RWE, with some excluded due to insufficient information available (n=43). Of the remaining 152 orphan submissions, 61% (n=93) referenced the use of at least one type of RWE. Furthermore, analysis found that the rate of positive reimbursement with RWE was 84% versus 81% without RWE.
CONCLUSIONS: In 2024, orphan drug submissions referencing RWE had higher reimbursement success, particularly in countries without orphan-specific HTA processes. These findings underscore RWE’s growing influence in HTA outcomes and highlight the need for orphan-specific considerations in Europe ahead of implementing Joint Clinical Assessments for orphan drugs.
METHODS: HTAs published in 2024 in 7 European countries were screened and categorised as orphan or non-orphan, with outcomes analysed to evaluate the likelihood of HTA success according to orphan-designation and use of orphan-specific reimbursement processes. The HTA documents for all orphan products were subsequently screened for the inclusion of RWE, determined by targeted searches for RWE-related terminology and common real-world data sources. HTA outcomes were then comparatively analysed to examine if the inclusion of RWE was associated with a higher likelihood of successful reimbursement.
RESULTS: In total, 1040 reimbursement decisions were included in the analysis: orphan (n=285) and non-orphan (n=755). For countries with orphan-specific routes, likelihood of a positive outcome was 87% for orphan drugs versus 66% for non-orphan drugs. Whereas for countries without separate orphan processes, this was 76% for orphan drugs versus 78% for non-orphan drugs. After de-duplication, 195 HTA submissions for orphan drugs were screened for the inclusion of RWE, with some excluded due to insufficient information available (n=43). Of the remaining 152 orphan submissions, 61% (n=93) referenced the use of at least one type of RWE. Furthermore, analysis found that the rate of positive reimbursement with RWE was 84% versus 81% without RWE.
CONCLUSIONS: In 2024, orphan drug submissions referencing RWE had higher reimbursement success, particularly in countries without orphan-specific HTA processes. These findings underscore RWE’s growing influence in HTA outcomes and highlight the need for orphan-specific considerations in Europe ahead of implementing Joint Clinical Assessments for orphan drugs.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2025-11, ISPOR Europe 2025, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Volume 28, Issue S2
Code
RWD154
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment, Real World Data & Information Systems
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas