ISPOR 18th ANNUAL EUROPEAN CONGRESS ISSUE PANEL EXPLORES ROLE OF ECONOMIC EVALUATION IN PRICING & REIMBURSEMENT OF MEDICINES

Published Nov 9, 2015

SESSION COMPARES ENGLAND, GERMANY, AND FRANCE

 Milan, Italy—November 9, 2015—The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) 18th Annual European Congress Issue Panel 1 explored, “What Is the Role of Economic Evaluation in Pricing and Reimbursement of Medicines: A Comparison Between England, Germany, and France.” This issue panel was held this morning at the MiCo – Milano Congressi in Milan, Italy. The issue panel was moderated by Wim Goettsch, PhD, Advisor International Affairs, National Healthcare Institute (ZiN), Diemen, The Netherlands and panelists: - Meindert Boysen, PharmD, MSc, Programme Director, Centre for Health Technology Evaluation, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK - Andreas Gerber-Grote, MD, PhD, Head of Health Economics, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Healthcare (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany - Jean-Luc Harousseau, MD, PhD, President, French National Authority for Health (HAS), Saint-Denis La Plaine, France European governments are increasingly using economic evaluations as a factor in decision making regarding reimbursement of medicines by national health insurance organizations. It is not clear, however, how economic evaluations of medicines are used in reimbursement and price negotiation. The panelists discussed the pros and cons of the different perspectives on economic evaluation. The most comprehensive use of economics has been in England, where economic evaluation is fully integrated in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) appraisals and is guided by the existence of a cost-effectiveness threshold. In Germany, economic evaluation plays a somewhat minor role in the process of early benefit assessment that was established in January 2011. In France, since October 2013, the appraisal of medicines by Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) (the French National Authority for Health) must include an economic evaluation for innovative products, which should assist the government in price negotiation. These different approaches raise questions about their impact on the outcome and timeliness of reimbursement decisions and pricing. Released presentations from the ISPOR 18th Annual European Congress are available at http://www.ispor.org/Event/ReleasedPresentations/2015Milan. ISPOR’s 18th Annual European Congress may be followed on social media using the hashtag #ISPORMilan.

###

Related Stories

Promoting Fairness in Funding Decisions

Jun 24, 2026

Value in Health announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers that offer new tools to help health policy makers weigh fairness alongside cost-effectiveness when deciding which treatments and programs to fund.

Listening to Patients in the Real World

Jun 23, 2026

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR announced today the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report outlining 9 areas to strengthen the robustness, transparency, and feasibility of real-world patient-reported outcomes studies.

ISPOR Task Force Addresses Critical Gap in Surrogate Endpoint Guidance

May 28, 2026

Value in Health, announced the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report providing guidance on the use of surrogate endpoint evaluation methods in health technology assessment (HTA) decision making. The report, “Methods for Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints for HTA Decision Making: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force,” was published in the May 2026 issue of Value in Health.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×