‘ONE SIZE FITS ALL’ GUIDELINE NOT COST-EFFECTIVE FOR ALL WOMEN WITH EARLY BREAST CANCER

Published Nov 18, 2014
Adelaide, South Australia - Due to early diagnosis and improved treatment, the number of breast cancer survivors is increasing. All of these women will need follow-up mammography to detect recurrent or new disease. International breast cancer clinical guidelines recommend annual follow-up mammograms for every woman after treatment for early breast cancer, regardless of their risk of recurrence. In the study, “A Patient-Level Calibration Framework for Evaluating Surveillance Strategies: A Case Study of Mammographic Follow-Up After Early Breast Cancer,” researchers from the University of Adelaide - Discipline of Public Health demonstrate the use of de-identified, routinely collected health service data and simulation modelling to predict the long-term costs and health outcomes of alternative mammography schedules for women, based on their age and the features of their primary breast cancer. The results showed that for younger postmenopausal women at moderate risk of recurrence, annual follow-up for five years, with two yearly visits thereafter appears to be cost-effective. For older women, a mammography schedule similar to screening intervals in the general population (2 yearly) is likely to be most cost-effective, if women continue to attend follow-up mammography. The researchers conclude that the current ‘one size fits all’ guideline of annual follow-up mammography may not be cost-effective for all women with early breast cancer. If the results are validated with larger, better quality datasets, this work could set the stage for personalised mammographic follow-up after breast cancer. Study author, Professor Jon Karnon states, “Early diagnosis and more effective treatment have significantly improved the prognosis of many cancer patients, but approaches to surveillance have not changed. These results indicate the potential to improve surveillance of cancer survivors from both a patient and health system perspective.”

Related Stories

International Study Confirms Universally Applicable Framework for Defining Digital Health Interventions

Jan 21, 2026

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR—The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, announced today the publication of a comprehensive international study demonstrating that the PICOTS-ComTeC framework serves as an effective universal standard for defining patient-facing digital health interventions. The report, “Towards a Common Ground for Defining Digital Health Interventions, Mapping Digital Health Frameworks to PICOTS-ComTeC: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report” was published in the January 2026 issue of Value in Health.

New Research Collection Reveals How Artificial Intelligence Is Reshaping Health Economics

Nov 6, 2025

The PhRMA Foundation and ISPOR announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers that explores the dynamic intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and health economics and outcomes research (HEOR).

ISPOR Announces 2025 Health Economics and Outcomes Research Award Honorees

Oct 20, 2025

ISPOR announced the recipients of its 2025 Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR) Scientific and Leadership Awards. ISPOR Scientific Awards are designed to foster and recognize excellence and outstanding achievement in HEOR and its Leadership Awards recognize excellence and outstanding leadership in the field.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×