‘ONE SIZE FITS ALL’ GUIDELINE NOT COST-EFFECTIVE FOR ALL WOMEN WITH EARLY BREAST CANCER

Published Nov 18, 2014
Adelaide, South Australia - Due to early diagnosis and improved treatment, the number of breast cancer survivors is increasing. All of these women will need follow-up mammography to detect recurrent or new disease. International breast cancer clinical guidelines recommend annual follow-up mammograms for every woman after treatment for early breast cancer, regardless of their risk of recurrence. In the study, “A Patient-Level Calibration Framework for Evaluating Surveillance Strategies: A Case Study of Mammographic Follow-Up After Early Breast Cancer,” researchers from the University of Adelaide - Discipline of Public Health demonstrate the use of de-identified, routinely collected health service data and simulation modelling to predict the long-term costs and health outcomes of alternative mammography schedules for women, based on their age and the features of their primary breast cancer. The results showed that for younger postmenopausal women at moderate risk of recurrence, annual follow-up for five years, with two yearly visits thereafter appears to be cost-effective. For older women, a mammography schedule similar to screening intervals in the general population (2 yearly) is likely to be most cost-effective, if women continue to attend follow-up mammography. The researchers conclude that the current ‘one size fits all’ guideline of annual follow-up mammography may not be cost-effective for all women with early breast cancer. If the results are validated with larger, better quality datasets, this work could set the stage for personalised mammographic follow-up after breast cancer. Study author, Professor Jon Karnon states, “Early diagnosis and more effective treatment have significantly improved the prognosis of many cancer patients, but approaches to surveillance have not changed. These results indicate the potential to improve surveillance of cancer survivors from both a patient and health system perspective.”

Related Stories

ISPOR Task Force Addresses Critical Gap in Surrogate Endpoint Guidance

May 28, 2026

Value in Health, announced the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report providing guidance on the use of surrogate endpoint evaluation methods in health technology assessment (HTA) decision making. The report, “Methods for Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints for HTA Decision Making: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force,” was published in the May 2026 issue of Value in Health.

How Is Health Valued in the United Kingdom? We Finally Have a Better Answer

May 27, 2026

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR—The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, announced today the publication of a pair of companion articles that together establish both the methodological foundation of the first definitive UK value set for the EQ-5D-5L and the practical implications of adopting it—thus equipping health technology assessment decision makers with a UK value set suitable for informing policy. The articles were featured in the May 2026 issue of Value in Health.

From Promise to Proof: Strengthening the Evidence Base for Digital Health Technologies

Apr 28, 2026

Value in Health announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers that advances evidence and methods for evaluating the real-world value of digital health technologies.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×