WORK PRODUCTIVITY IN RHEUMATIC DISEASES AND PSORIASIS

Published Oct 21, 2014
Prague, Czech Republic - Chronic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriasis (Ps) are the types of diagnoses that lead to progressive disability and productivity loss.  They are associated with significant costs to both the health care system and society, and therefore, productivity costs are generally considered to be extremely relevant. A team of researchers from the Institute of Health Economics and Technology Assessment and the Institute of Rheumatology found that patients with chronic diseases (RA, AS, Ps) experience similar productivity loss and costs, which are predicted by patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical parameters. In the study, “Work Productivity and Costs Related to Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Psoriasis,” the researchers sought out to determine and compare the impact of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriasis on work productivity, calculate the productivity costs, and map the factors that influence work productivity. Patients with AS, RA and Ps reported more than 40% overall work productivity loss and daily activity impairments at a deterioration of 50%. In contrast to clinical parameters (DAS28, BSA, PASI), PROs (i.e. HAQ, BASDAI) were identified as major predictors of loss of productivity. The average annual loss of productivity cost per patient was estimated to be €2,000. The authors point out that: “If a particular health care system (i.e., the Czech Republic health care system) opts to use other costs (the loss of productivity) and other outcomes (employability) in the reimbursement decision-making process, it is important that they adequately describe the burden of each particular health care problem with respect to productivity under Czech conditions, since productivity loss calculations are country-specific with limited transferability. This approach would be able to clearly describe the appropriate and comprehensive effect of treatment and intervention. The first step towards this goal should involve active data collection on the quality of life, functional disability, and the effect on productivity.” Those individuals interested in more information on this topic may wish to read research by Klára Kruntorádová, MSc, a health economic analyst at the Institute of Health Economic and Technology Assessment in Prague and lead researcher of this study.

Related Stories

Progress and Paradox: Healthcare Reform, Innovation, and Inequality in the Arabian Gulf and Wider Region

Apr 1, 2026

ISPOR announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers in Value in Health Regional Issues that presents a comprehensive body of evidence aimed at advancing value-based healthcare across the Arabian Gulf and the wider Middle East and North Africa region. Guest editors for the themed section are Paul Revill, Sara Al-Dallal, and Anderson Stanciole. The series was published in the March 2026 issue of Value in Health Regional Issues.

Health Equity Research Goes Global—Without Waiting for Perfect Data

Feb 9, 2026

Value in Health Regional Issues announced the publication of a special collection of research papers in showing that meaningful progress in health equity research is occurring across regions and in settings with different data environments and policy needs.

Value in Health Regional Issues Expands Editorial Scope and Reveals Plans to Transition to Gold Open Access Model

Jan 23, 2024

Value in Health Regional Issues, an official journal of ISPOR—The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, announced the expansion of its editorial scope and its plan to transition to a gold open access journal.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×