INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENT LEADERS OUTLINE POTENTIAL FOR SOCIAL MEDIA TO ACCELERATE PRO DEVELOPMENT

Published Mar 9, 2015
Raritan, NJ, USA - A collaboration designed to open dialogue between industry and government leaders has found “great potential” for social media to support content validity of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments, and outlined how the use of social media can create more diverse and cost effective data collection. The collaborator’s discussions are highlighted in a new paper titled, “Can We Use Social Media to Support Content Validity of Patient-Reported PRO Instruments in Medical Product Development?” The paper has been made available for free in Value in Health, the official journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Written by a team of nonprofit, private industry and government officials, the paper addresses an issue that has received little attention in the scientific literature: how to collect data that supports content validity in a way that is acceptable for regulatory use in pharmaceutical labeling. The growth of social media in health care has spurred interest in the topic. As more patients share their health experiences online, the Internet has emerged as a new foundation for developing and validating new PROs because researchers can more easily target and engage patient populations online than with traditional methods such as face-to-face or telephone interviews. The paper compares various approaches to collecting and analyzing data and outlines a vision of how social platforms could accelerate PRO development and lead to reliable instruments. It also stresses the need to develop additional empirical evidence to answer questions about how populations are recruited and represented, and which types of social media are most appropriate for data collection. The paper’s authors include: Ari Gnanaskathy, Head of Patient-Reported Outcomes at RTI Health Solutions; Elektra J. Papadopoulos, MD, MPH; Study Endpoints and Labeling Development (SEALD); Study Endpoints team in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA); Margaret Rothman, PhD, CEO, Rothman Associates Consulting; and Paul Wicks, PhD, Vice President of Innovation at PatientsLikeMe. Contact Margot Carlson Delogne PatientsLikeMe mcdelogne@patientslikeme.com 781-492-1039

###

Related Stories

ISPOR Task Force Addresses Critical Gap in Surrogate Endpoint Guidance

May 28, 2026

Value in Health, announced the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report providing guidance on the use of surrogate endpoint evaluation methods in health technology assessment (HTA) decision making. The report, “Methods for Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints for HTA Decision Making: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force,” was published in the May 2026 issue of Value in Health.

How Is Health Valued in the United Kingdom? We Finally Have a Better Answer

May 27, 2026

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR—The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, announced today the publication of a pair of companion articles that together establish both the methodological foundation of the first definitive UK value set for the EQ-5D-5L and the practical implications of adopting it—thus equipping health technology assessment decision makers with a UK value set suitable for informing policy. The articles were featured in the May 2026 issue of Value in Health.

From Promise to Proof: Strengthening the Evidence Base for Digital Health Technologies

Apr 28, 2026

Value in Health announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers that advances evidence and methods for evaluating the real-world value of digital health technologies.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×