Demodex Blepharitis Patient Journey: A Medical Chart Audit Study

Author(s)

Ho A1, Mun J2, Chan A2, Doshi R2, Periman L3, Maiti S3, Whitley W4, Skaar J5, Hadker N6, Athavale A7
1Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Mountlake Terrace, WA, USA, 2Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Irvine, CA, USA, 3Periman Eye Institute, Seattle, WA, USA, 4Virginia Eye Consultants, Norfolk, VA, USA, 5Trinity Life Sciences, New York, NY, USA, 6Trinity Life Sciences, Waltham, MA, USA, 7Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Waltham, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Demodex blepharitis (Db) is an under-diagnosed disease caused by an overgrowth of Demodex mites. Db results in a chronic inflammation of the eyelid margin and has no FDA-approved treatments. This study aimed to understand how the disease is diagnosed and the patient journey in Db.

METHODS: The study combined a cross-sectional survey of US-based optometrists and ophthalmologists (Eye Care Providers - ECPs) and a retrospective medical chart review of patients diagnosed with Db for at least 6 months. The study assessed patient-specific data including demographics, diagnosis and examination history, and Db management history.

RESULTS: A total of 192 qualifying charts of Db patients (average age of 56 years, range 18-85) were provided by 61 participating ECPs. Three phases were identified in the patient journey: 1) Patient presentation pre-diagnosis; 2) path to diagnosis; and 3) post-diagnosis. At presentation, the most common symptoms included redness (55%), itchy eyelids (46%), and eye inflammation (40%), leading patients to their initial visits. Despite symptoms, only 37% of patients were diagnosed at presentation. On the path to diagnosis, patients received an average of 3 tests and were diagnosed primarily via the evaluation of lid margins using a bright light and a magnification (72%) and the high-magnification slit lamp examination (69%). Over-the-counter warm eye compresses were initiated in 45% of patients. More aggressive management with in-office eyelid blepharoexfoliation and topical prescription antibiotics were also used pre-diagnosis in 14% and 12% of patients, respectively. After Db diagnosis, 96% of patients received a variety of management, including dry-eye disease prescriptions (20%), topical antibiotics (15%), and in-office eyelid blepharoexfoliation (23%). Despite attempts at disease management, patients continued to see their ECPs an average of 3.3 times post-diagnosis due to unresolved Db symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the challenges of Db misdiagnosis and the lack of resolution using current approaches to Db disease management.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

HSD39

Disease

Sensory System Disorders (Ear, Eye, Dental, Skin)

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×