Has the Publication of China Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations 2020 influenced the Study Quality of Economic Evaluations in China? A Systematic Review

Author(s)

Shihuan C1, Liang W2, Liang C1, Lin H1, Gao C1, Yang L1, Liu Y1, Suo Y1, Liu K1, Chen Y1, Jin X1
1Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China, 2Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 11, China

OBJECTIVES: As one of the published Pharmacoeconomics recommendations, China Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations 2020 (China PE Guidelines 2020) was methodological guideline for economic evaluations (EE). This study aimed to review the Chinese EE since 2016 with the criteria of China PE Guidelines 2020, and to observe whether its release was helpful for improving the study quality of Chinese EE.

METHODS: We systematically searched China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, VIP Database and China Biology Medicine disc. Studies were included if they compared costs and outcomes among different interventions. Study quality was compared using studies published before and after China PE Guidelines 2020 as two subgroups and studies related and unrelated to traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) as two categories.

RESULTS: A total of 2,894 studies were included (published from January 1, 2016 to July 10, 2022), involving 2,383 (82.3%) and 511 (17.7%) published before and after China PE Guidelines 2020, respectively. The quality of TCM-related studies was better than that of TCM-unrelated studies in aspects of cost identification scope matching study perspective, health outcomes matching evaluation types, incremental analysis and uncertainty analysis. After China PE Guidelines 2020’s release, Chinese EE have significantly enhanced awareness of clarifying their study perspective (P < 0.001); and the clarity of TCM-related studies was much higher than that of TCM-unrelated studies (P = 0.005). An analogous change has taken place in the aspects of cost identification scope matching perspective, incremental analysis and uncertainty analysis. However, TCM-related studies focused on short-time research and less on correct discounting throughout.

CONCLUSIONS: The release of China PE Guidelines 2020 has played a positive role in improving the study quality of Chinese EE. To better support decision-making, it still remains to be upgraded. (This research was sponsored by Beijing Nova Program Z211100002121060 and Fundamental Research Funds for Beijing University of Chinese Medicine 2022-JYB-JBRW-003).

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

SA81

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Literature Review & Synthesis, Value of Information

Disease

Alternative Medicine, No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×