Expert Analysis- Healthcare Value Assessment Frameworks Have Advanced, But Wholesale Adoption Still Not Wise

Published Sep 23, 2019

Lawrenceville, NJ, USA—September 23, 2019—Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR—the professional society for health economics and outcomes research, announced today the publication of an analysis showing that while value assessment frameworks are moving closer to meeting the challenge of accurately measuring value and reliably informing healthcare decisions, more progress is needed before widespread adoption and use. The study, “As Value Assessment Frameworks Evolve, Are They Finally Ready for Primetime?,” was published in the September 2019 issue of Value in Health. An accompanying commentary by Peter J. Neumann, ScD, Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health at the Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA, appears in the same issue of Value in Health.

Authors Dubois and Westrich briefly describe the evolution of the value assessment framework landscape in the United States, including new entrants and updated frameworks. To assess whether this evolution successfully advances the field of value assessment, they examined the current frameworks actively conducting assessments—those from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, Innovation and Value Initiative, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network—relative to 6 key considerations for improvement. These 6 considerations were identified via a prior peer-reviewed analysis based on the National Pharmaceutical Council’s Guiding Practices for Patient-Centered Value Assessment. They include:

  1. Value assessments should be transparent and reproducible
  2. Value is dynamic and needs to be considered and captured as such
  3. Value assessments should adopt broad system perspectives in what they assess and how they assess it
  4. Value assessments should incorporate what is important to patients, even if the end user for a framework is the payer
  5. A diversity of value assessment approaches that reflect the differing needs of stakeholders should remain; value assessments should reflect user preferences
  6. Assessments of value should be separate from assessments of budget impact and affordability

The analysis found that value assessment frameworks are moving closer to meeting the challenge of accurately measuring value and reliably informing healthcare decisions, but more progress is needed before widespread adoption and use.

“Our investigation shows that the field of value assessment has advanced in most areas,” said author Kimberly Westrich, MA, Vice President of Health Services Research, The National Pharmaceutical Council, Washington, DC, USA. “Indeed, each of the 6 considerations has been addressed in some way by at least one framework. However, more progress is needed before the widespread adoption of frameworks for decision making. Users must be aware that these assessments have limitations, and wholesale adoption is not wise. While value assessments are potential inputs that can be considered for healthcare decision making, none of them should be the sole input for these decisions. Considering the limitations, they should, at most, be only one of many tools in the toolbox.”

###

ABOUT ISPOR
ISPOR, the professional society for health economics and outcomes research (HEOR), is an international, multistakeholder, nonprofit dedicated to advancing HEOR excellence to improve decision making for health globally. The Society is the leading source for scientific conferences, peer-reviewed and MEDLINE®-indexed publications, good practices guidance, education, collaboration, and tools/resources in the field.
Web: www.ispor.org | LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/ispororg | Twitter: www.twitter.com/ispororg (@ISPORorg) | YouTube: www.youtube.com/ispororg | Facebook: www.facebook.com/ispororg | Instagram: www.instagram.com/ispororg

ABOUT VALUE IN HEALTH
Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) is an international, indexed journal that publishes original research and health policy articles that advance the field of health economics and outcomes research to help healthcare leaders make evidence-based decisions. The journal’s 2018 impact factor score is 5.037. Value in Health is ranked 4th among 81 journals in health policy and services, 5th among 98 journals in healthcare sciences and services, and 11th among 363 journals in economics. Value in Health is a monthly publication that circulates to more than 10,000 readers around the world.
Web: www.ispor.org/valueinhealth | Twitter: www.twitter.com/isporjournals (@ISPORjournals)

Related Stories

Health Technology Assessment Around the World: Broadening the Understanding of Cross-Country Differences

Jan 22, 2020

Value in Health announced today the publication of a series of articles investigating the use of health technology assessment (HTA) in healthcare decision making across the globe. The series, “HTA Around the World—Influences of Culture, Values, and Institutions,” appears in the January 2020 issue of Value in Health.

Introducing “Health Years in Total:” A Novel Framework for Valuing Health Outcomes in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses

Jan 21, 2020

Value in Health announced today the publication of an article introducing a new framework for valuing health outcomes in cost-effectiveness analyses. This new metric, “health years in total,” is a robust approach that overcomes specific limitations of quality-adjusted life-year and equal value of life measures.

ISPOR Recognized by MarCom Awards for Its Annual Report and Rebranding of Value in Health

Dec 3, 2019

ISPOR announced that it has won a number of MarCom Awards recognizing the rebranding of its high-impact journal Value in Health and for its 2018 Annual Report.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×