Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument Selection- Designing a Measurement Strategy

Abstract

Objective

To discuss issues in the design of a measurement strategy related to the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in support of a labelling claim.

Methods

In association with the release by the US Food and Drug Administration of its draft guidance on the use of PROs to support labeling claims, the Mayo/FDA Patient-Reported Outcomes Consensus Writing Group was formed. This paper, part of a series of manuscripts produced by the Writing Group, focuses on designing a PRO measurement strategy.

Results

Developing a PRO measurement strategy begins with a clear statement about the proposed label claim that will derive from the PRO data. Investigators should identify the relevant domains to measure, develop a conceptual framework, identify alternative approaches for measuring the domains, and synthesize the information to design the measurement strategy.

Conclusion

A position of “reasonable pragmatism” is recommended such that the best available measurement strategy be considered as evidence for labeling.

Authors

Claire F. Snyder Maria E. Watson Joseph D. Jackson David Cella Michele Y. Halyard

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×