CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LINEZOLID IN NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA TREATMENT FROM PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PERSPECTIVES IN BRAZIL

Author(s)

Vasconcellos JF1, Santos PM1, Fernandes RA1, Haas LC1, Amaral LM1, Ferreira CN2, Rufino CS2
1ANOVA, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2Pfizer, Inc., São Paulo, Brazil

OBJECTIVES: Nosocomial pneumonia (NP) is the second most common cause of in-hospital infection and the leading cause of death from infections acquired in hospitals commonly caused by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). This study aims to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes related to NP treatment with linezolid versus teicoplanin and vancomycin from a private and public payer’s perspectives in Brazil. METHODS: A decision-tree model simulates NP treatment with linezolid (600mg bid, 19 days), teicoplanin (400mg bid, 22 days), and vancomycin (15mg/kg bid, 24 days) and their associated costs in a time horizon of complete hospital care. After a first evaluation patients with response continued with maintenance treatment and those with failure switched to a second treatment. Efficacy data (clinical response) was generated by meta-analysis based on systematic literature review. Costs included drugs, medical follow-up and adverse events management, collected from Brazil official databases (values represented 2013 BRL). RESULTS: Clinical response, days on ward, and intensive care unit (ICU) days were [72.6%; 7; 12], [68.3%; 8; 14], and [66.5%; 8; 16] for linezolid, teicoplanin, and vancomycin, respectively. Total treatment costs with linezolid, teicoplanin, and vancomycin were 49,426.43BRL, 79,710.87BRL and 81,352.99BRL from the private perspective and 15,213.60BRL, 13,884.51BRL, and 24,348.44BRL from the public perspective, respectively. Linezolid represented the least costly in private perspective (economy of 30,284BRL and 31,927BRL when compared to teicoplanin and vancomycin). The main cost driver for all treatments was related to daily in ICU followed by adverse events management (teicoplanin and vancomycin) and drug acquisition (linezolid). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, linezolid in NP management presented the greatest clinical response, shorter hospital stay in ward and ICU, and lower price when compared to teicoplanin and vancomycin in Brazilian private healthcare system and lower price when compared to teicoplanin in public set.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-05, ISPOR 2014, Palais des Congres de Montreal

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 2014)

Code

PIN35

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×