Post-Infusion Monitoring Costs By Site of Care Among Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL) Who Received Second-LINE Treatment with Lisocabtagene Maraleucel (LISO-CEL) in the Transform Study: A United States Subgr ...

Author(s)

McGarvey N1, Vaidya N1, Gitlin M1, Lee A1, Ung B2, Carattini T2, Keating SJ2
1BluePath Solutions, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVE: Although chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy is generally administered in the inpatient setting, opportunities exist for treatment in the outpatient setting to reduce costs. Post-infusion costs for liso-cel by site of care may differ between the United States (US) and other countries. This analysis assessed post-infusion monitoring costs by site of care among US patients with LBCL treated with liso-cel as a second-line therapy in the TRANSFORM study (NCT03575351).

METHODS: Individual patient-level case report forms detailing health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients receiving liso-cel were analyzed. A 2-step micro-costing methodology identified HCRU and estimated associated costs using a 6-month time horizon, beginning with the date of liso-cel infusion. First, HCRU in the 6-month timeframe post-infusion was calculated. Next, costs were applied to each HCRU. Unit costs were measured from the health care system perspective, using peer-reviewed literature and public sources, and adjusted to 2021 US dollars. Analyses were stratified by administration site.

RESULTS: Among 56 patients treated with liso-cel in TRANSFORM, 39 (70%) and 17 (30%) patients were classified as inpatients and outpatients, respectively. Estimated mean (median) 6-month total post-infusion monitoring costs (excluding liso-cel acquisition) were $96,436 ($67,169) and $51,823 ($42,172) for inpatients and outpatients, respectively, a difference of $44,613 ($24,997). Facility costs were the primary driver of costs in both settings. Among all patients, median (range) total length of stay (LOS) was shorter for outpatients than inpatients (0 [0‒21] vs 11 [0‒80] days). Among 8 (47%) outpatients who were hospitalized, median (range) time from liso-cel infusion to first inpatient admission was 18 (2‒160) days; median (range) total LOS was 9 (4‒21) days.

CONCLUSIONS: In US outpatients treated with liso-cel, lower costs and reduced LOS were observed when compared with inpatients. This study illustrates potential cost savings and reduced HCRU with outpatient administration of liso-cel in TRANSFORM.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

EE286

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×