Disease Burden Analysis of Prophylactic Treatment Versus On-Demand Treatment for Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Haemophilia A in China

Author(s)

Tan B1, Lin A1, Xuan J1, Han L2, Hu N2, Bai L2, Sun J3, Hu S4
1Health Economic Research Institute, School of Pharmacy, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China, 2Pharmaceuticals, Bayer Healthcare Company Ltd., Beijing, China, 3Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, 4School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical outcomes and economic burden of prophylactic treatment with on-demand treatment in adult patients with moderate-to-severe haemophilia A in China.

METHODS: The analysis was conducted from a societal perspective over a one-year period. A disease burden model was developed to evaluate clinical outcomes and costs of prophylactic treatment versus on-demand treatment with recombinant factor VIII in 5 selected centres in China. Total bleeding events, hospitalizations for major surgeries, outpatient visits and productivity loss due to haemophilia were modelled and compared. Treatment patterns, treatment effectiveness, healthcare resource utilization, and direct medical costs were derived from a survey conducted in 5 centres across the country. Opinions from patient organization experts were used for inputs regarding indirect and societal costs. Scenario analyses were undertaken to assess the impact of an increased proportion of adults receiving prophylactic treatment.

RESULTS: The mean annual number of total bleeds was lower in patients receiving prophylaxis than those receiving on-demand treatment (4.4 vs. 27.0). The base-case analysis favoured prophylaxis over on-demand as it is associated with lower total costs per patient in one-year (¥430,652 CNY vs. ¥446,413 CNY). Prophylactic treatment saved ¥42,952 CNY in non-drug costs compared to on-demand treatment due to decreased bleeding and productivity loss, which offset more expensive prophylactic drug costs. When extrapolated to national level, the societal savings would be 531 million CNY per year. Compared with the base-case, assuming that the proportion of adult prophylaxis is increased by 10%, 20% and 30%, the projected incremental cost saving would be ¥12, ¥24 and ¥36 million CNY each year, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic treatment for adult patients with haemophilia A was a cost-saving strategy compared with on-demand treatment in China from societal perspective and should be chosen as a preferred approach in clinical practice.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

EE634

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Decision Modeling & Simulation, Surveys & Expert Panels, Work & Home Productivity - Indirect Costs

Disease

STA: Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×