DO FLEXIBLE SURVIVAL MODELS PROVIDE BETTER EXTRAPOLATIONS THAN STANDARD SURVIVAL MODELS? A SIMULATION STUDY.

Author(s)

Kearns B1, Stevenson MD1, Triantafyllopoulos K1, Manca A2
1The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2University of York, Heslington, York, UK

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Funding decisions for health technologies often require estimates of future survival, and hence require accurate extrapolations. There is guidance on the use of standard survival models for extrapolation, and growing interest in the use of more flexible models. However, it is unclear if more flexible models provide more accurate extrapolations than standard models. The aim of this study was to populate this evidence-gap using a representative simulation study.

METHODS: We simulated data from a two-mixture-Weibull model, representing patients with either a high hazard (short survival) or a low hazard (long survival). We considered nine scenarios: three different lengths of follow-up and three different sample sizes. Standard survival models were the exponential, Weibull, Gompertz, log-logistic, lognormal, gamma and generalised gamma. Flexible models were fractional polynomials, two spline models (one extrapolated a cubic polynomial trend, the other a linear trend), and a dynamic survival model (DSM) which extrapolates a linear trend. The primary outcome was the mean-squared-error (MSE) which combines bias and variance.

RESULTS: Extrapolations from the fractional polynomials were very unstable with many hazards becoming infinitely large. Spline models with cubic extrapolations were highly variable, with MSE values worse than standard models for all scenarios. Both the DSM and spline model with a linear extrapolation had lower MSE than standard models for all of the scenarios considered, although this improvement was only statistically significant for the DSM.

CONCLUSIONS: Extrapolations from DSMs provided the best trade-off between bias and variance, followed by spline models extrapolating a linear trend. In general, there was considerable uncertainty in the results; a significant improvement compared with standard models was only seen for DSMs. Estimates from the remaining models showed a very high variance, and do not appear suitable for routine generation of extrapolations under the scenarios considered.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PNS327

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Modeling and simulation

Disease

No Specific Disease

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×