Methods for Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints for Health Technology Assessment Decision Making: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force

Abstract

Surrogate endpoints are frequently used as primary outcomes in clinical trials. This is appropriate when they are validated for their ability to predict clinical benefit measured on patient-relevant target outcome(s). Such validation is often lacking, thus increasing uncertainty in the decision-making process of regulatory bodies, health technology assessment agencies and payers.

Authors

Sylwia Bujkiewicz Oriana Ciani Bart Heeg Dawn Lee Jeanette M. Kusel Kristian Thorlund Petros Pechlivanoglou Stephen Stefani Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai Marc Buyse Mario Ouwens

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×