Fundamental Measurement and Quality-Adjusted Life Years

Abstract

We write in response to a recent discussion in Value in Health over the preference weights for the EQ-5D-5L. It would appear that there is disagreement over weights and the options open to move from the EQ-5D-3L value framework to the EQ-5D-5L that support reference case lifetime models for NICE value assessment.

Authors

Paul C. Langley Stephen P. McKenna

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×