Prevalence and Factors Associated with the Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Andlow Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWH) in Cancer Patients

Author(s)

Johnson ML1, Yande S2, Aparasu RR3, Wanat M3, Toale K4
1University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA, 2RTI Health Solutions, Durham , NC, USA, 3College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA, 4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

OBJECTIVES:

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a fatal comorbidity prevalent in cancer patients. Low-molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have been the preferred treatment for cancer associated thrombosis (CAT). Direct-oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a relatively newer drug class used for treating CAT. Treatment guidelines provide inconsistent recommendations. This study aimed to study the prevalence and predictors associated with utilization of these anticoagulation strategies.

METHODS:

This retrospective cohort study used SEER Medicare data from years 2011-2019. Patients with lung, pancreatic, breast, colorectal, prostate, and/or stomach cancer, diagnosed with a VTE and a prescription of a LMWH or DOAC were included. Patients had to be over the age of 65 during VTE diagnosis and continuously enrolled in Medicare parts A, B & D for one year before the VTE diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify significant factors associated with the use of DOACs versus LMWHs.

RESULTS:

The cohort included 4892 LMWH and 5080 DOAC treated patients. Patients with more advanced cancer (OR=0.54, 95% CI=0.41-0.70) were significantly less likely to receive a DOAC as compared to patients in the initial stages. Certain cancer types including breast (OR=1.93, 95% CI=1.65-2.25), colorectal (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.18-1.90) and prostate (OR=2.12, 95% CI=1.77-2.52) were more likely than lung cancer patients to be prescribed DOACs. Stomach (OR=0.83, 95% CI=0.64-1.07) and pancreatic (OR=0.78, 95%CI=0.66-0.91) cancer patients were less likely to be on DOACs as compared to lung cancer patients. Patients were significantly more likely to be prescribed a DOAC in 2019 (OR=106.39, 95% CI= 42.19-268.28) and the more recent years as compared to 2011. Patients on active cancer treatment were less likely to be on a DOAC (OR=0.74, 95% CI=0.67-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS:

Several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were associated with the use of DOACs, with year of VTE diagnosis being the strongest predictor. Even without a consistent clinical guideline, physicians have been prescribing DOACs to patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

RWD92

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Confounding, Selection Bias Correction, Causal Inference

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders (including MI, Stroke, Circulatory)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×