Healthcare Resource Utilization in US Clinical Practice Among Patients with von Willebrand Disease
Author(s)
Du P1, Swallow E2, Marden J2, Billmyer E2, Yim E2, Sun S1
1Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, 2Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES:
International guidelines recommend long-term prophylaxis for patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) and severe/frequent bleeding, but this is not currently approved in the US. We assessed healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in patients with VWD including those eligible for prophylaxis.METHODS:
This retrospective cohort study used data from an integrated US healthcare system (Geisinger Health). Two cohorts were analyzed: (1) patients with ≥2 diagnoses of VWD from 01/2004–12/2020, and (2) the subset of these patients who were eligible for prophylaxis (history of ≥3 joint bleeds, ≥2 gastrointestinal bleeds, ≥5 total bleeds in the last 12 months, or ≥1 major bleed). Patients with other bleeding disorders were excluded. Patients eligible for analysis had ≥6 months of available data before the index date (defined as first date of VWD diagnosis or date meeting prophylaxis eligibility, respectively). HRU was measured during the 6-month period after the index date using linked claims data.RESULTS:
Linked data were available from 110 VWD patients overall and 23 prophylaxis-eligible VWD patients (none received long-term prophylaxis). The proportion of patients with all-cause hospitalizations was similar in prophylaxis-eligible VWD patients and the overall VWD population (22% vs 20%). Among those with ≥1 hospitalization, prophylaxis-eligible VWD patients experienced a higher mean±SD number of hospitalizations (2.2±2.7 vs 1.1±0.3) and total mean hospital days (10.0±14.5 vs 4.8±3.0 days). Nearly all patients had ≥1 outpatient visit, with a mean±SD of 9.7±7.9 and 11.0±11.6 visits, respectively. Almost half (48%) of prophylaxis-eligible VWD patients had an all-cause emergency department visit versus 28% in the overall VWD population. The proportion of patients with ≥1 VWD-related outpatient (91% vs 81%) or emergency department (39% vs 13%) visit was also higher for prophylaxis-eligible VWD patients.CONCLUSIONS:
Prophylaxis-eligible VWD patients experienced a higher HRU burden than the overall VWD population, suggesting a potential benefit from long-term prophylaxis.Conference/Value in Health Info
2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)
Code
EE185
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas