Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Biosimilars Based Treatment Sequences for Moderate-to-Severe Crohn Disease in Spain

Author(s)

Fernandez JM1, Monte Boquet E2, Borrás Blasco J3, Romero de la Cruz E4, González Galán R4, Singh MK5, Sharma V5, Merino-Bohórquez V6
1Sandoz Farmacéutica (Novartis Group), Madrid, Spain, 2Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain, 3Hospital de Sagunto, Valencia, Spain, 4Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, Madrid, Spain, 5Novartis Healthcare Private Limited, Hyderabad, India, 6University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain

INTRODUCTION

Crohn's disease (CD) yields a considerable burden to the Spanish National Health System (NHS). Thanks to the advent of adalimumab and infliximab biosimilars (bADA, bINF), costs burden decreased substantially. However, a further assessment on additional efficiencies is warranted. The NHS’s Willingness to Pay (WTP) per additional Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) could be considered an important metric to assess.

OBJECTIVES:

To quantify, with current drug acquisition costs (October 2021):

  • QALYs per patient when comparing different sequences in CD treatment, starting with bADA or bINF or other biologics -vedolizumab (VED), ustekinumab (UST), following loss of response to initial conventional therapy (CT) –immunomodulators and/or corticosteroids.
  • Net Monetary Benefit per patient (NMB = WTP* ΔQALY - ΔCosts) provided by each of above treatment sequences.
MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

We used a hybrid model, according to the CD clinical practice; made of two subsets: first, a decision tree to accommodate short induction phase; and second, Markov-state transition model to simulate patients within long-term maintenance phase. All including both direct and indirect costs, as well as clinical outcomes.

Model spanned 5 and 10 years’ time horizons. Costs and benefits discounted at annual rate of 3%, whilst 20,000 €/QALY as WTP; deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS:

Over a 10-year time horizon, sequences commencing with two biosimilars –cycling- remain the most cost-effective choice for the NHS. In particular, bADA followed by bINF provides with additional 0.06 QALYs, and €2,045 NMB versus UST followed by bADA, becoming dominant (less expensive more efficacious) too. Shortening the time horizon to 5 years, results were 0.07 and €6,532 respectively, while maintaining the dominancy.

CONCLUSIONS:

According to the analysis performed, within moderate-to-severe CD treatment, biosimilar cycling (bADA, bINF) provides higher cost-effectiveness and QALYs for both NHS and patients. This merits further research on real world setting

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

EE142

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Disease

Biologics and Biosimilars

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×