Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Trends Among US Adults with Type I Diabetes in National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS)

Author(s)

Rowland J
Kantar Health, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES : Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), an alternative to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for adults with type I or type II diabetes, has continued to improve in both accuracy and accessibility since first approved by the FDA in 1999. This study examined trends in CGM among US adults with type I diabetes from 2017 to 2020.

METHODS : Data on US adults were analyzed from the 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020 National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS), a nationally-representative, cross-sectional online survey. Analysis sample from each year included respondents who self-reported both diagnosis of type I diabetes and use of insulin. Results were weighted to be representative of the US population.

RESULTS : Among US adults with type I diabetes, self-reported use of any glucose tester or monitor was 94.3% in 2017, 94.4% in 2018, 91.8% in 2019, and 92.6% in 2020. Among these adults, self-reported use of CGM was 36.0% in 2017, 38.4% in 2018, 44.8% in 2019, and 55.3% in 2020. Overall, across all adults with type I diabetes, use of CGM increased from 33.9% to 51.2% over the last four years. Among US adults with type I diabetes in 2020, those using CGM were younger on average than those using SMBG (43.0±1.07 vs. 47.3±1.54; p=0.004). Similarly, when compared to all other adults with type I diabetes, those using CGM were more likely to be married/living with a partner (62.3% vs. 49.1%; p=0.012) and have a lower average Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (1.54±0.11 vs. 2.30±0.34; p=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS : In a broadly representative US population of adults with type I diabetes, self-reported use of CGM increased from 33.9% to 51.2% from 2017 to 2020, becoming the preferred glucose test or monitor. Comparisons of CGM users versus those using SMBG indicated a significant age gap.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PDB45

Topic

Medical Technologies, Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Medical Devices, Patient Behavior and Incentives, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Survey Methods

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders, Medical Devices

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×