Systematic Literature Review of Second-LINE Treatments for SMALL-Cell LUNG Cancer

Author(s)

Hanvesakul R1, Rengarajan B2, Stack C3, Wilson F4, Adeyemi A4
1Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Oxford, England, UK, 2Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 3Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 4PRECISIONheor, Vancouver, BC, Canada

OBJECTIVES:

Lurbinectedin received accelerated FDA approval for patients with metastatic small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy based on results from a single-arm basket trial (NCT02454972). We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) to evaluate clinical trials of second-line SCLC therapies recommended by NCCN Guidelines and assessed the feasibility of an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) to estimate relative efficacy and safety of lurbinectedin versus relevant comparators.

METHODS:

Predefined searches of published and unpublished data were executed on January 6, 2021. Eligible non-randomized and single-arm trials were included only when comparative randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were unavailable for an intervention of interest. Two independent reviewers conducted abstract/full-text selection and data extraction.

RESULTS:

Of 4,769 citations identified, 10 unique relevant trials were included (5 RCTs, 2 single-arm trials, 2 RCTs with 1 arm of interest, and 1 with randomized and non-randomized cohorts with 1 arm of interest). Although there were differences in proportions of patients with sensitive/resistant disease, ECOG status, and limited/extensive disease, other baseline characteristics were generally consistent. Nine trials included patients with both limited- and extensive-stage disease at diagnosis. Three trials enrolled patients with platinum-sensitive disease (chemotherapy-free interval [CTFI] ≥90 days), 6 trials included patients with sensitive and resistant disease (CTFI <90 days); 1 trial did not report sensitivity. Only 5 trials included >10% of patients with resistant disease. In platinum-sensitive disease, median overall survival was between 5.8 and 8.1 months for topotecan (IV or oral), 7.5 months for platinum-rechallenge, and 11.9 months for lurbinectedin.

CONCLUSIONS:

These SLR results suggest that an ITC is feasible, as required assumptions are not prohibitive. Population-adjusted ITCs are required to adequately compare lurbinectedin with other treatments, given the inclusion of several disconnected single-arm trials. Restricting the ITC to patients with platinum-sensitive disease (CTFI ≥90 days) would reduce heterogeneity.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)

Code

POSC28

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×