WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF ADDING EXTRA HEALTH DIMENSIONS TO THE EQ-5D?

Published Apr 15, 2015
Oxford, UK  -  Generic preference-based measures of health are commonly used to evaluate the impact of diseases and their treatments on overall health related quality of life by weighting their dimensions using people’s value judgements. However, these measures, including the EQ-5D, may miss key dimensions of health for some conditions. A team of researchers from Oxford University, Brunel University, and Sheffield University explored the potential solution of adding extra dimensions to the EQ-5D, a practice known as a ‘bolt-on’ approach. They developed three dimensions describing hearing impairment, vision impairment, and tiredness to add separately to the five core dimensions of the EQ-5D. Interviews were undertaken among 300 members of the UK general public to elicit people’s preferences for the health states with and without the extra dimensions, and data were analysed to examine the magnitude and direction of impact on health state values of the extra dimensions. Study co-author, Dr. Yaling Yang, PhD, from the University of Oxford concluded, “Each of the bolt-on dimensions had a significant impact on values for EQ-5D health states. The extent and direction of the impact of the bolt-on varied according to the level of severity of the bolt-on dimension and the severity of the state to which it was added. The results of this research suggest that simple valuation of these bolt-on items may not be possible; however, further research is required to confirm this exploratory finding.” The full study, “An Exploratory Study to Test the Impact on Three “Bolt-On” Items to the EQ-5D,” is available Open Access in Value in Health.

Related Stories

Measuring What Matters: Broadening the Scope of Health Economics Evaluation to Incorporate Well-Being

Jul 9, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers in Value in Health that offer insights into facets of economic evaluation aimed to incorporate well-being into decision making.

Confronting the Backlash Against QALYs: Key Insights From Leading Health Economists

Jun 18, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of a collection of papers that examine the long-standing debate surrounding the use of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and alternative measures in healthcare decision making.

ISPOR Good Practices Report Offers Guidance for Using Real-World Data From EHRs in Health Technology Assessments

Jun 17, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report that proposes a framework for assessing the suitability of electronic health records data for use in health technology assessments. The report, “Assessing Real-World Data from Electronic Health Records for Health Technology Assessment: The SUITABILITY Checklist: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force” was published in the June 2024 issue of Value in Health.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×