TREATMENT FAILURE, COMPLICATIONS AND COSTS OF LEVOFLOXACIN VS. AMOXICILLIN/CLAVULANATE ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY IN OUTPATIENT COMMUNITY ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA (CAP)
Author(s)
Vanja Sikirica, PharmD, Manager, Primary Care Outcomes Research1, Dilesh Doshi, PharmD, Associate Director, Regional Outcomes Research2, Anthony Feliu, PhD, Analytic Developer3, Jeff R. Schein, DrPH, MPH, Senior Director, Outcomes Research, Primary Care1, Stephen J. Boccuzzi, PhD, MBA, FAHA, Senior Scientist, Policy Research4, Carmela Janagap, MS, Associate Director, Primary Care Outcomes Research1, Boyung Shim, MPH, Account Director31Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA; 2 Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, San Diego, CA, USA; 3 PharMetrics, a unit of IMS, Watertown, MA, USA; 4 IMS Health, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA
OBJECTIVES: To examine treatment failure rates, disease-related medical complications and healthcare costs among CAP outpatients treated with levofloxacin (LEVO) or amoxicillin/ clavulanate (AC). METHODS: Using adjudicated, commercial health insurance claims data (PharMetrics, Inc.), patients with an outpatient CAP diagnosis between July 2003 and December 2004, aged 18–64, with 6-months enrollment pre– and post–diagnosis, receiving LEVO or AC monotherapy within 3 days of diagnosis, were identified. Patients with recent hospitalization (10 days), prior antibiotic therapy (30 days), or immunocompromised state were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as receipt of a renewal or alternative antibiotic claim, or hospitalization 28 days post–prescription claim. Complications and infection related costs were tracked for 6-months post–diagnosis. Demographic, clinical, pre–index utilization, and study endpoints were evaluated via descriptive, univariate (Wilcoxon and Chi-Square tests for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively) and multivariate techniques (logistic regression for treatment failure and complications, General Linear Model for costs). RESULTS: Of 4030 LEVO and 951 AC patients analyzed, the cohorts had similar demographic and clinical profiles (pre–diagnosis utilization and cost, comorbidity burden, Charlson score), except age (LEVO vs AC: 45.8 vs. 42.7 y, p<0.001), gender distribution (females 49.5% vs. 53.4%, p<0.001), and asthma prevalence (4.9% vs 6.8%, p=0.017). The AC group had a higher percentage (22.0% vs. 18.5%, p=0.015) and likelihood (OR=1.27, 95% CI 1.07–1.52, p=0.007) of treatment failure than the LEVO group. The rates of infection–related complications were 8.6% for LEVO and 8.2% for AC; (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.80–1.56, p=0.52). No difference was observed in infection–related costs (mean ± SD: LEVO $1067 ± 3562 vs. AC $1159 ± 5874). CONCLUSION: LEVO and AC groups were comparable. The LEVO group experienced significantly lower treatment failure, but no significant differences in complications or costs, compared to the AC group, in outpatient CAP.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2007-05, ISPOR 2007, Arlington, VA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 10, No.3 (May/June 2007)
Code
PIN3
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine), Respiratory-Related Disorders
Explore Related HEOR by Topic