PREVALENCE OF GLAUCOMATOUS RISK FACTORS IN PATIENTS FROM A MANAGED-CARE SETTING- A PILOT EVALUATION

Author(s)

Ervin N. Fang, MD, Glaucoma Standards and Sourcing Team, Assistant Chief of Ophthalmology, Consultative Glaucoma Service1, Simon K. Law, MD, Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology in the Glaucoma Division2, John G Walt, MBA, Senior Manager3, Tina H Chiang, PharmD, Senior Research Associate31Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2 Jules Stein Eye Institute UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 3 Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of glaucomatous risk factors (RFs) in glaucoma patients in a managed-care practice. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of 1189 glaucoma patients. Diagnosis and documentation information of 15 RFs reported to be associated with glaucoma progression were collected. The 15 RFs included age > 70, family history, African American origin, high intraocular pressure (IOP), increase cup/disc (C/D) ratio, poor visual field score, disc hemorrhage, pseudoexfoliation sign, low central corneal thickness (CCT), high myopia, cardiovascular disease, systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), migraine headache, and vasospasm. The average risk score for the population was calculated using the predictive model based on 5 risk factors (age, IOP, CCT, C/D ratio, VF score, and DM) derived from Medeiros et al. (2005), where a higher score indicates greater risk. RESULTS: 1,182 of 1,189 patients for which medical records were available had a clear diagnosis in the charts. Mean age (63.0 ± 11.9 years) and the average IOP (18.3 ± 4.7 mm Hg) was calculated. Average value of C/D ratio was 0.52 ± 0.18, pattern standard deviation was 2.59 ± 1.99 dB, and CCT was 552 ± 34 microns. The glaucomatous RF with the highest incidence was systemic hypertension (39.0%), followed by age > 70 (27.2%), DM (23.6%), African American origin (23.0%), and a family history of glaucoma (18.2%). An average risk score was 42 for this population. CONCLUSION: Three of the five most prevalent glaucomatous RFs from this population were not included in the predictive model. The prevalence of RFs and risk scores may be compared with a non-glaucoma patient population or a population of glaucoma patients without glaucomatous RFs to determine the relative risk difference. Existing models for calculating glaucoma risk scores do not consider several important risk factors, and these variables should be considered in future calculation models.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2007-05, ISPOR 2007, Arlington, VA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 10, No.3 (May/June 2007)

Code

PEY2

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health

Disease

Sensory System Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×