COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF DOCETAXEL VERSUS OTHER REGIMENS IN THE ADJUVANT THERAPY OF EARLY AND LOCALLY ADVANCED BREAST CANCER IN POLAND
Author(s)
Jacek Walczak, MD, partner1, Dariusz Pawlik, Msc, Manager1, Rafal Wojcik, Msc, partner1, Marcin Kaczor, MD, partner1, Joanna Lis, PhD, Health Economic Manager2, Grzegorz Nogas, Msc, partner11Arcana Institute, Cracow, Poland; 2 Sanofi-Aventis, Warsaw, Poland
OBJECTIVES: To compare cost effectiveness of docetaxel chemotherapy with other adjuvant treatment regimens in early and locally advanced breast cancer. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness Markov model from payer perspective (health insurance and patient), using costs information from published sources and the patient lifetime horizon. RESULTS: Two comparisons, TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide – 75/50/500 mg/m2, 6 cycles) vs FAC (fluorouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophophamide – 500/50/500 mg/m2, 6 cycles) and FEC+T (fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide – 500/100/500 mg/m2, 3 cycles + docetaxel 100 mg/m2, 3 cycles) vs FEC (fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide – 500/100/500 mg/m2, 6 cycles), were performed. One randomized clinical trial was included for each comparison. Average costs of the treatment of early or locally advanced breast cancer (including adjuvant chemotherapy, additional treatment – tamoxifen/radiotherapy, treatment of adverse events and disease recurrence) and treatment effects were per patient: TAC 42883 PLN/25,7 LYG vs FAC 8799 PLN/23,6 LYG; FEC+T 32828 PLN/26,1 LYG vs FEC 13505 PLN/24,7 LYG. ICER for TAC vs FAC comparison was 16558 PLN/LYG. ICER for FEC+T vs FEC was 13 904 PLN/LYG. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel regimens are more effective and more expensive in the treatment of patients with early and locally advanced breast cancer compared with FAC and FEC chemotherapies, ICER range 13904-16558 PLN/LYG.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2007-05, ISPOR 2007, Arlington, VA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 10, No.3 (May/June 2007)
Code
PCN13
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology, Reproductive and Sexual Health