RETROSPECTIVE MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW TO DETERMINE THE “AT GOAL” PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION AND/OR DYSLIPIDEMIA
Author(s)
Gunnarsson P1, Livengood K2, Lytken Larsen M3, Pettersson S4, Claeys MJ5, Norstrom F6, Saldeen Nilehn K7, Beys J8, 1Outcomes Research Department, Pfizer European Service Center, Zaventem, Belgium; 2Outcomes Research Department, Pfizer Pharmaceutical Group, New York, NY, USA; 3University Department of Cardiology, Aarhus Amtsygehus, Aarhus, Denmark; 4Specialist Enheten Proxima, Nacka Sjukhus, Nacka, Sweden; 5Department of Cardiology, U.Z. Antwerpen, Edegem, Belgium; 6Medicinkliniken, Angelholms Sjukhus, Angelholm, Sweden; 7Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; 8St. Maarten Ziekenhuis, Duffel, Belgium
OBJECTIVE: To generate data about treatment patterns for patients with hypertension and/or dyslipidemia and to identify the number achieving a treatment goal according to international guidelines. The data collected will also be used to validate a new software program that the Outcomes Research department at Pfizer has developed. METHODS: Six clinics/doctors in three European countries (Belgium, Denmark, and Sweden) participated in this retrospective medical record review. For each patient visit, the available data from the previous 1-2 years was collected. Data collected included blood pressure measurements, lipid profiles, glucose levels, HbA1c, co-morbidities, and medications. Guidelines used in the analysis where: Hypertension - 1999 WHO–ISH guidelines for the management of hypertension. Hyperlipidemia- Recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Coronary Prevention. RESULTS: Reviewing each patient’s last visit, 33 of 189 were at goal for hypertension or 17%. For lipids, 42 of 179 (32%) where at goal. 50% of patients diagnosed with diabetes had HbA1c below 7% at the last visit and 65% of them were at goal for lipids, but only 14% for hypertension. CONCLUSION: The number of patients found to be “at goal” in this study is far from being optimal, but it is similar to numbers seen in the literature. The software was found to function as expected by utilizing only the data that doctors routinely collect in their practice. The “at goal” information is valuable, because it allows health care providers to track over time one of the ‘factors’ that will be (and is being) used to measure the quality of the care they are providing. HMOs in the US can use the information gathered to create reports for NCQA and HEDIS and in the UK the new cardiovascular NSF standards have been incorporated into the software.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2000-11, ISPOR Europe 2000, Antwerp, Belgium
Value in Health, Vol. 3, No. 5 (September/October 2000)
Code
PCV10
Topic
Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
Topic Subcategory
Quality of Care Measurement
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders
Explore Related HEOR by Topic