QUALITY-ADJUSTED TIME WITHOUT SYMPTOMS AND TOXICITY (Q-TWIST) OF FOTEMUSTINE COMPARED WITH DACARBAZINE IN PATIENTS WITH DISSEMINATED MALIGNANT MELANOMA

Author(s)

W Robert Simons, PhD, President1, Steinar Aamdal, MD, PhD, Clinician2, Axel Hauschild, PrivDozDrmed, Clinician3, Pete Mohr, Dr, Clinician4, Jean-Jacques Grob, Professor, Clinician51Global Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Inc, Summit, NJ, USA; 2 Cancer Clinic, Oslo, Norway; 3 Universitats-Hautklinik, Kiel, Germany; 4 Dermatologisches Zentrum, Buxtehude, Germany; 5 Chu Hospitalier Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille, France

OBJECTIVES: This study compares effectiveness of fotemustine and dacarbazine in treatment of patients with malignant melanoma with or without brain metastases using a Quality Adjusted Time Without Symptoms and Toxicity (Q-TWiST) integrating efficacy, safety and quality of life (QoL) into a composite measure of effectiveness. METHODS: Clinical trial data from a published study of fotemustine versus dacarbazine were used to partition overall survival into time spent in specific health states including toxicity, no progression and disease progression. Time spent with toxicity or disease progression was weighted by an arbitrary utility weight of 0.5. Survival analyses were conducted on the partition components. Time spent with toxicity or brain metastases was another analysis. Utilities were varied for sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The composite measure, taking into account both efficacy and safety, demonstrated that fotemustine (N=112) was significantly more effective than dacarbazine (N=117), with an increase in quality-adjusted survival compared with dacarbazine (7.35 versus 5.64 months; P = 0.044). After taking into account time spent with toxicities, disease progression was avoided for an additional 1.54 months compared with dacarbazine (P = 0.005), a gain that is clinically significant for patients with a life expectancy of 6 to 9 months. Additionally, the mean quality-adjusted time to brain metastases was 15.39 months for the fotemustine treated patients compared to 7.04 months for the dacarbazine treated patients, for a gain of 8.35 months (P = 0.057). The quality-adjusted survival adjusting for time spent with toxicity or with brain metastases also favored treatment with fotemustine, 8.03 months versus 6.25 months (P = 0.054). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the results to be robust. CONCLUSION: Q-TWiST analyses integrates efficacy, safety and QoL into a measure more appropriate for the assessment of cancer treatment and confirmed that fotemustine is significantly superior to dacarbazine, and provides a good alternative for the treatment of patients with malignant melanoma.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2007-10, ISPOR Europe 2007, Dublin, Ireland

Value in Health, Vol. 10, No. 6 (November/December 2007)

Code

PCN1

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×