NON-PERSISTENT USE OF ORAL ANTIDIABETIC DRUGS LEADS TO 20% DECREASED CHANCE OF HBA1C GOAL-ATTAINMENT IN DAILY CLINICAL PRACTICE

Author(s)

Jeroen Koerselman, MD, PhD, Research Associate1, Sjoukje van der Bij, MSc, Research Associate1, Joëlle A. Erkens, PhD, Manager Business Development & Global Accounts1, Sophia Kessabi, PharmD, Msc, Health Economics Manager2, Martijn T. Groot, PhD, Health Economics & Pricing manager3, Fernie JA. Penning-van Beest, PhD, Research Associate1, Ron MC. Herings, PhD, Director11PHARMO Institute, Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; 2 Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 3 Novartis Pharma B.V, Arnhem, Netherlands

OBJECTIVES: Within the Dutch guidelines for treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), the target-value of HbA1c has been set at <7%. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between persistence with oral antidiabetic drug (OAD-)treatment and HbA1c goal-attainment in daily clinical practice. METHODS: From the PHARMO record linkage system, comprising among others, linked drug-dispensing, clinical laboratory, and hospital data for >2.3 million subjects in the Netherlands, new users of OADs were identified in the period 1999-2005. Patients who started on monotherapy with metformin, a sulphonylurea (SU), or a thiazolidinedione (TZD), or on combination therapy with metformin+SU, or metformin+TZD, with baseline HbA1c °Ý7% and at least one HbA1c-measurement in the period of 6-12 months after treatment-onset, were included in the study-cohort. Persistence with OAD-treatment in the first year of treatment was determined using the method of Catalan, and was defined as the duration of the first treatment-episode in days. In case the first treatment-episode overlapped with the date of a HbA1c-measurement, a patient was considered persistent at that measurement. Patients with HbA1c <7% were defined at goal. RESULTS: The study cohort included 2023 patients. Three-quarters (1512 patients) were persistent with any OAD at the time of first HbA1c-measurement in the time-period of 6-12 months after OAD-start: of these, 861 (57%) were at goal. Of the 511 patients who were non-persistent with any OAD at that time, 239 (47%) were at goal. Non-persistent patients were about 20% less likely to be at goal (RR-adj: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74-0.91), compared to persistent users of any OAD. CONCLUSION: Non-persistent use of OADs leads to a 20% decreased chance of HbA1c goal-attainment in daily clinical practice. This effect of non-persistence seems modest, but represents a very large number of patients, in whom OAD-use might be better controlled.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2007-10, ISPOR Europe 2007, Dublin, Ireland

Value in Health, Vol. 10, No. 6 (November/December 2007)

Code

PR2

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Adherence, Persistence, & Compliance

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×