FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES IN OSTEOARTHRITIS TREATMENT IN CZECH REPUBLIC

Author(s)

Jana Skoupá, MD;, MBA, Medical Director1, Václava Cerna, PharmDr;, MBA, Market Research1, Tomáš Doležal, MD;, PhD, Academic2, Milan Cernek, MD, Manager31Pharma Projects, Prague, Czech Republic; 2 3-rd Medical Faculty Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; 3 Zentiva a.s, Prague, Czech Republic

OBJECTIVES: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are frequently used in Czech Republic for pain symptoms associated with osteoarthritis (OA). The annual consumption of NSAID reaches almost 1 billion CZK (36 million €). Non-selective cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors (e.g. diclofenac, ibuprofen) are mostly prescribed but often cause gastrointestinal side effects, including life threatening ulceration, perforation or bleeding (PUB). We assessed direct healthcare costs of meloxicam (preferential COX-2 inhibitor, daily dose 7.5mg) versus piroxicam (20mg/day) and diclofenac (100mg/day) based on two large-scale clinical trials (MELISSA and SELECT). METHODS: A model based on both studies with meloxicam and published in literature was used. It included acquisition costs for medications and costs for management of adverse events (AE). To identify medical practice in AE management - especially PUB, a questionnaire was prepared to collect data from gastroenterology departments. Eight departments were involved in a retrospective data acquisition; these data were translated into weighted average costs of particular AE treatments. The 2006 prices were used to assess direct medical costs. RESULTS: Among most costly AEs were gastrointestinal ulceration - mean costs per patient 160€ (118-225€), bleeding and penetration of ulcer - 934€ (281-1362€) and ulcer perforation 2342€ (1542-3011€). If gastrointestinal complications of diverse severity were taken into account, mean costs (per patient treated for 28 days) for piroxicam were 10.4€, for diclofenac 10.6€ and meloxicam 7.8€. Costs for AE management represented 70-80 % of these costs in non-selective drugs and almost 60 % of meloxicam total costs. CONCLUSION: Management of gastrointestinal AEs generates a significant cost driver of total treatment costs in NSAID users. The higher incidence of severe complications with non-selective NSAID resulted, despite of a lower acquisition price, in higher costs of those medications compared to meloxicam.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2007-10, ISPOR Europe 2007, Dublin, Ireland

Value in Health, Vol. 10, No. 6 (November/December 2007)

Code

PAR12

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×