COST-UTILITY OF PEGINTERFERON-ALFA-2A (40 KD) IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEPATITIS B WITH AND WITHOUT THE “E” ANTIGEN IN BRAZIL

Author(s)

Hoel Sette, PhD, Professor1, Raymundo Parana, PhD, Professor2, Mario Pessoa, PhD, Professor3, Deborah Crespo, PhD, Professor4, Fmr Barros, PhD, Professor5, Mario Giorgio Saggia, MBA, Health Economics Manager6, Eduardo AV Santos, Bachelor, Health Economics Analyst6, Rafael Simoes, MD, Medical Manager61Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil; 2 Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil; 3 Instituto de Infectologia Emílio Ribas, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil; 4 Universidade Federal do Para, Belem, PA, Brazil; 5 Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil; 6 Roche Brazil, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

OBJECTIVES: Two billion people worldwide have been infected with hepatitis B virus and approximately 400 million present chronic disease. Part of chronically infected patients with HBV develop cirrhosis and liver failure. Two strategies are adopted for treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a) use of interferon (conventional and pegylated) for a limited timeframe and b) use of nucleoside/tide analogs for a determined period. This analysis aims to assess the Incremental cost-utility ratio for peginterferon-alfa-2a (40 KD) versus lamivudine, for treatment of HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients with hepatitis B, from the perspective of the National Health Service. METHODS: A Markov model was used to estimate the clinical and economic impact of the incorporation of peginterferon-alfa-2a (40 KD). Clinical stages were based on liver histology, cirrhotic decompensation, liver cancer and liver transplantation. Costs were estimated based on resource utilization described in a Delphi panel with experts. Response and seroconversion rates with peginterferon alfa-2a (40 KD) were 36% for HBeAg-negative, and 32% for HBeAg-positive patients. For lamivudine, rates were 23% and 19%, respectively. Data concerning the quality-of-life were extracted from the international literature, due to the lack of local data. A lifetime horizon was assumed. RESULTS: The ICER (peginterferon-alfa-2a vs. lamivudine) was R$ 20,192 HBeAg-negative patients, and R$ 33,749 for HBeAg-positive patients, assuming a discount rate of 3%. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted using second-order Monte Carlo simulation. Tested parameters were costs per stage, treatment costs, discount rate, and responsiveness to treatment. The 95% confidence interval for the ICER ranged from R$ 12,275 to R$ 35,048 for HBeAg-negative patients, and R$ 17,771 to R$ 67,430 for HBeAg-positive patients. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that therapy with peginterferon-alfa-2a (40 KD) has a robust and favorable cost-utility ratio in the Brazilian public health system for both serological profiles.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2007-10, ISPOR Europe 2007, Dublin, Ireland

Value in Health, Vol. 10, No. 6 (November/December 2007)

Code

PIN36

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×