COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANNUAL TREATMENT COSTS OF GLARGINE INSULIN AND DETEMIR INSULIN IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS IN SPAIN
Author(s)
Lourdes Betegon, Msc, Health Economists1, F Alvarez Guisasola, Dr, Dr2, C Casal LLorente, MSc, Pharmacists3, C Rubio-Terrés, MSc, Health Economics4, Amaya Echevarria, Msc, Director of Health Economics department51IMS HEOR, Madrid, madrid, Spain; 2 Centro de Salud la Calzada, Gijón, Asturias, Spain; 3 Centro de Salud Villagarcía de Arosa, Pontevedra, Spain; 4 HERO Consulting, Madrid, Spain; 5 sanofi-aventis, Madrid, madrid, Spain
OBJECTIVES: In Spain there are several pharmaceutical products for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), with different profiles which implies alternative patterns of administration. A comparative study comparing annual costs linked to the treatment with Glargine insulin (GI) and Detemir insulin (DI) has been performed with the Spanish National Health System perspective. METHODS: Clinical data related with each treatment derives, mainly, from a study performed by Rosenstock et.al (2006): a 52-week open-label, parallel, multinational trial, which compares efficacy and safety of GI and DI. This trial has shown that patients treated with GI required less dairy dose of insulin and suffer from less severe hypoglycaemia than those patients treated with DI. Data about other use of related medical resources (consumption of needles and blood glucose tests, and management of major hypoglycaemic episodes) has been obtained from Spanish published literature. Costs calculations refer to year 2007 and have been derived from Spanish databases and published tariffs. RESULTS: Patients treated with ID require 65% more dose than those treated with GI, and suffer more major hypoglycaemic events. In patients with DM2 management with GI has lower total costs than DI, which allows savings up to 534.96€ per patient-year. Savings are related with costs of total insulin, needles and blood glucose tests and also medical management required in case of major hypoglycaemic events. CONCLUSION: For patients with DM2 treatment with GI is an efficacious and safe therapeutic option compared with DI, because GI is associated with lower annual total costs, and allows saving up to 534.96€ per patient-year i.e. a 34% saving per patient-year.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2007-10, ISPOR Europe 2007, Dublin, Ireland
Value in Health, Vol. 10, No. 6 (November/December 2007)
Code
PDB43
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders