BELGIAN COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF LUCENTIS (RANIBIZUMAB) IN WET AGE RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION
Author(s)
Karen Moeremans, MD, Health Economist1, Lieven Annemans, PhD, Professor of Health Economics2, Pascal Lecomte, Pharm, MSc, Health Economics Manager31IMS Health, Brussel, Belgium; 2 Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; 3 Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Vilvoorde, Belgium
OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-utility of intravitreal treatment with ranibizumab (Lucentis) versus current management of wet subfoveal age-related macular degeneration (AMD) from the perspective of the Belgian health care payer (RIZIV/INAMI + patient) and social security. METHODS: A 10-year Markov model was developed containing 5 disease states defined by treated eye visual acuity (VA) and a state “death”. AMD lesion types included minimally classic (MC-AMD), occult (OC-AMD) and predominantly classic (PC-AMD). Safety and VA transition probabilities were obtained form phase III clinical trials (MARINA, ANCHOR, PIER). In the base-case, the model simulates the clinical trial treatment durations of 1 year (PC-AMD) and two years (MC-AMD, OC-AMD). Treatment was followed by best supportive care (BSC). Ranibizumab PRN dosing was modeled as 8 and 6 annual injections over the first 2 years. Ranibizumab was compared to verteporfin + photodynamic therapy (V+PDT) in PC-AMD and OC-AMD and to BSC in all lesions. National age-adjusted mortality was applied. Direct medical costs were calculated by multiplying resource use obtained through expert opinion with unit costs. Direct non-medical costs of blindness were derived from literature. Utility scores were obtained from a general population sample using time-trade-off methodology. Costs were discounted at 3% annually, effects at 1.5%. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, ranibizumab was cost-effective in all lesions. The probability of incremental cost-utility below 35,000€/QALY was 98% in PC-AMD, 83% in OC-AMD and 79% in MC-AMD. Sensitivity analyses ranged from dominance for 1 year treatment in PC-AMD to 36,755€/QALY for 3 years treatment (4 injections in 3rd year) in OC-AMD. Results were sensitive to ranibizumab dosing frequency and duration and to the cost of blindness. CONCLUSION: PRN dosing of ranibizumab for one to three years was cost-effective in all lesion types, from a health care payers and social security perspective.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2007-10, ISPOR Europe 2007, Dublin, Ireland
Value in Health, Vol. 10, No. 6 (November/December 2007)
Code
PEY7
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Sensory System Disorders