A REVIEW OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES THAT COMPLEMENT ASSESSMENTS OF SEIZURE REDUCTION IN ADULT EPILEPSY DRUG TRIALS
Author(s)
Marko A. Mychaskiw, RPh, PhD, Director1, Deborah L. Hoffman, PhD, Research Consultant21Pfizer, Inc, New York, NY, USA; 2 Deborah Hoffman, PhD, LLC, New Haven, CT, USA
OBJECTIVES: 1) To identify patient-reported outcomes used to complement assessments of seizure reduction in adult epilepsy drug trials; 2) to identify trials that specifically examined the impact of treatment on patient-reported anxiety, depression and sleep disturbance, as these common comorbid symptoms are associated with poorer health status in people with epilepsy; and, 3) to identify which measures/domains were most responsive to change. METHODS: A review of 41 adult epilepsy trials examining the impact of an oral antiepileptic drug on patient-reported assessments of anxiety, depression, well-being, sleep, function and treatment satisfaction. Studies were identified through searches in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists of published articles. RESULTS: The most common types of PROs comprised epilepsy-specific measures assessing multiple domains of functioning and well-being (used in 30 studies) and generic measures assessing anxiety/depression and other emotions (used in 21 studies). There was limited detection of treatment effect on scales assessing anxiety/depression and emotional well-being. Scales assessing perceptions of emotional well-being were more likely to show significant differences than measures assessing symptom severity. Patients were not required to have clinically significant anxiety/depression to participate. It is possible that patients entered trials with symptoms in the normal range, leaving no room to show improvement; that treatment did not worsen symptoms; or, that instruments were not responsive. Findings were mixed regarding other specific health status domains. Patients receiving active treatments typically reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction than those receiving placebo. Only 2 trials were identified that assessed patient-reported sleep, but both showed significant differences on specific domains. CONCLUSION: Anxiety and depression were among the most common PROs assessed, but there was limited detection of treatment effect. Trial selection criteria complicate interpretation of findings. Patient-reported sleep outcomes were rarely studied, but deserve more attention in adult epilepsy drug trials.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2007-10, ISPOR Europe 2007, Dublin, Ireland
Value in Health, Vol. 10, No. 6 (November/December 2007)
Code
PND37
Topic
Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, PRO & Related Methods, Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction
Disease
Neurological Disorders