INTRODUCTION OF ROSUVASTATIN WILL ENABLE MORE PATIENTS TO ACHIEVE GUIDELINE LDL-C GOALS WITHIN A FIXED BUDGET IN THE UK

Author(s)

Ryan J1, Gilmour R2, Piercy J3, Saleh A4, Brown J5, 1Mapi Values, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; 2 Adelphi Medi Cine, London, United Kingdom; 3 Adelphi Group, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom; 4 Mapi Values, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom; 5 AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: Rosuvastatin (Crestor(r)) is a new statin with proven efficacy for reducing plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. A model has been developed to estimate the budget impact and incremental cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin compared with other statins for reducing LDL-C levels and treating patients to goal. METHODS: The model considered the treatment of an adult population with hypercholesterolaemia over a 1-year period from the perspective of the UK primary Health care provider. The clinical benefit was a simulated estimate of the proportion of the population attaining the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guideline goal LDL-C plasma level (<3 mmol/L). The model compared the cost of statin treatment using current prescribing patterns with a scenario in which 30% of patients currently receiving statins are switched to rosuvastatin. Patients are switched from existing products according to market share. Sensitivity analyses varied the potential prescribing share of rosuvastatin. RESULTS: Following rosuvastatin introduction, the anticipated cost saving for a population of 1,000 patients would be £8,052 (€12,849) per year, with an additional 103 patients reaching the EAS goal LDL-C level. Assuming a fixed budget, the introduction of rosuvastatin would allow an additional 30 patients to be treated with rosuvastatin, with a total 132 extra patients achieving the goal. The analysis showed that rosuvastatin is cost-effective compared with atorvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results were robust to changes in the prescribing share of rosuvastatin. CONCLUSION: The introduction of rosuvastatin into primary care prescribing should enable more patients to be treated with a statin than is currently possible, and more patients would reach EAS goal LDL-C levels. Compared with other currently available statins, prescribing rosuvastatin would allow resources to be used more efficiently. The model can be adapted for any European country to determine the cost-effectiveness and potential budget impact of a new statin.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2003-11, ISPOR Europe 2003, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 6, No. 6 (November/December 2003)

Code

PCV60

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×