ECONOMICAL IMPACT OF SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION THERAPY IN 62 PATIENTS WITH LOWER URINARY TRACT DYSFUNCTION
Author(s)
Cappellano F1, Bertapelle P2, Spreafico L3, del Popolo G4, Kocjancic E5, Donelli A6, Ponzi P7, Giardiello G7, Caprari F8, Catanzaro F1, 1Multimedica Milano, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy; 2CTO CRF-MA, Turin, Turin, Italy; 3E. Franchini Hospital, Montecchio Emilia, R E, Italy; 4Ospedale Careggi, Firenze, Firenze, Italy; 5Ospedale Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Novara, Italy; 6Medtronic Europe, Tolochenaz, vaud, Switzerland; 7Medtronic Italy, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy; 8Centro Studi Fondazione Medtronic Italia, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy
OBJECTIVES: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) such as detrusor instability or urinary retention strongly impacts quality of life, involving economical aspects and social living. The aim of our investigation is to record changes in hospitalizations, Urological, and general practitioner visits before and after sacral nerve stimulation therapy. Expenses for pads, catheters, and drugs are also investigated. METHODS: From February 2000 to September 2002 we enrolled 62 patients in the economic session of the Italian Sacral Nerve Modulation Registry (mean age 50 years old, from 22 to 70). Economic data was recorded in order to compare costs with clinical results of sacral nerve modulation therapy in patients with LUTS. In this group 41 were incontinent patients (61 % female) mean age 53; 21 patients (71 % female) mean age 46 had urinary retention. RESULTS: We performed a quarterly analysis, comparing the baseline data to the last follow up available (12 month). Visits to the general practitioner decreased from 1.1 to 0.05 (p <0.01), visits to the urologist did not change significantly from baseline (1.5 to 1.2). Diagnostic tests decreased from 2 to 0.8 (p <0.01). In the use of pads we observed a major change from 2.1/day (3 months expenses per patient of € 120.96) to 0.5 (3 months expenses per patient of €28.8) (p = 0.08); For urinary retention the use of catheters decreased from 1.1 baseline (3 months expenses per patient of €178.2) to 0.1 at 12 months (3 months expenses per patient of €16.2) (p = 0.09). Drug consumption decreased significantly (p <0.05) from €47.24 to €10.53. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in daily consumption of pads and catheters (which is the major cost-driver of urinary disorders), but also the reduction of costs due to general practitioner visits, diagnostic tests, and drug consumption are significantly changed.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2003-11, ISPOR Europe 2003, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 6, No. 6 (November/December 2003)
Code
PUK9
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Urinary/Kidney Disorders
Explore Related HEOR by Topic