COST-MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS OF TENSION-FREE VAGINAL TAPE VS. OPEN BURCH COLPOSUSPENSION IN FEMALE STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE

Author(s)

Lahoz R1, Magaz S2, Badia X2, Amat L3, Bielsa O4, Díez-Gómez E5, Fillol M6, Gálmes Í7, Santiago A8, Santisteban J9, 1Health Outcomes Policy And Economics, Barcelona, Spain; 2Health Outcomes Research Europe, Barcelona, Spain, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; 3Hospital Sant Joan De Deu, Barcelona, Spain; 4Hospital Nuestra Señora Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; 5Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain; 6Hospital Vila-Real, Castellón, Spain; 7Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Madrid, Spain; 8Hospital Virgen Del Camino, Navarra, Spain; 9Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficiency of two surgical procedures for the treatment of female Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI): Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT) and Open Burch Colposuspension (OBC), through an economic evaluation. METHODS: A cost-minimization model was undertaken as evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials show there are no statistically significant differences between efficacy rates of both procedures in the short and medium term. The model was carried out from the public payer's perspective (National Health System) with a time horizon of 3 months. The resource use and costs with each procedure were compared in terms of pre-surgical resources, the surgical intervention itself, hospitalization, post-surgical follow-up and management of complications. Outcomes of the model were the average cost per patient and the incremental cost (additional cost or savings) between the two procedures. Resource use data was collected from a panel of 7 clinical opinion leaders specialized in female SUI (3 urologists and 4 gynaecologists). All unit costs were retrieved from published sources and refer to 2002 Euros. Sensitivity analyses were performed for key parameters of the model. RESULTS: In the base case, the overall average cost per patient was €1680.56 and €3015.86 with the TVT and OBC respectively. Incremental cost per patient was €-1335.30, the largest difference was due to the length of hospital stay (€-1468.50). The surgical procedure was the only item that resulted in more resource consumption in the TVT procedure (differential cost per patient of €158.29). Sensitivity analyses showed that even in the case where the TVT patients are hospitalized for 3 days, the TVT procedure remains the least resource consuming and the least costly option (differential cost per patient of €-513.80). CONCLUSIONS: The TVT procedure proved to be more efficient than the OBC option in the surgical treatment of female SUI.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2003-11, ISPOR Europe 2003, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 6, No. 6 (November/December 2003)

Code

PUK6

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Urinary/Kidney Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×