COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF AN INTERNET-BASED PATIENT EDUCATION PROGRAMME FOR ASTHMATIC CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS

Author(s)

Runge C1, Tews JT1, Lecheler J2, Horn M3, Horn M3, Schaefer M4, 1GlaoxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG, Munich, AL, Germany; 2Asthmazentrum Berchtesgaden, Berchtesgaden, Germany; 3Forum Telemedizin GmbH, Munich, Germany; 4Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany

OBJECTIVES: With a prevalence of 10% asthma is the most common chronic disease among children and adolescents in Germany. Approaches to reduce the burden of asthma comprise patient education as a well-recognised and effective component that helps to improve self-management skills. We determined whether a continuous internet-based education programme (IEP) as an add-on to traditional education improves health outcomes of asthma patients (8-16 years) at a favourable benefit-cost ratio. METHODS: We performed a prospective cost-benefit analysis alongside a non-randomised trial. A total of 438 patients in 34 study centres in Germany were enrolled in the investigation. Study participants were assigned to a control group and two intervention groups. Patients in both intervention groups received traditional patient education. In one group patients received additional self-management education through the IEP for the duration of 6 months. At the initial visit and at 6 and 12 months health service utilisation data were collected. RESULTS: Utilisation of various Health care services (e.g. number of consultations, urgent medical examinations) decreased significantly in both intervention groups. In the first year after intervention traditional education realised morbidity cost savings of 333 EUR per patient. Adding the IEP provided incremental savings of €143. From a payer perspective, the benefit-cost ratio of the traditional education programme was 0.45. Adding the IEP improved the ratio (0.69). For patients with moderate or severe asthma the benefit-cost ratio were 1.07 and 1.42 (with IEP). In individuals who had experienced an emergency visit due to asthma 6 months prior to the study entry, the ratios were 1.11 and 1.21, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As a supplementary to traditional asthma education programmes, the IEP offers the potential to realise incremental morbidity savings. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that within 1-year morbidity cost savings surpass the intervention costs in patients who belong to risk groups.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2003-11, ISPOR Europe 2003, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 6, No. 6 (November/December 2003)

Code

CS4

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×