TOTAL HEALTHCARE EXPENDITURES FOR MIGRAINE PATIENTS ASSOCIATED WITH CHOICE OF DRUG THERAPY

Author(s)

Schabert VF1, Esposito D1, Bowers BW2, Rousey A1, Tillotson F1 , 1The MEDSTAT Group, Santa Barbara, CA, USA; 2GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 120 million Americans suffer from migraines, leading to impaired functional capacity and substantial societal costs. Studies have shown that migraine sufferers use more healthcare resources than non-migraine sufferers. This study compares healthcare resource use among migraineurs receiving various drug treatments. METHODS: Fee-for-service patients with a migraine or headache diagnosis were selected from the MEDSTAT MarketScan databases. Enrollment, medical claims, and prescriptions were analyzed from January 1, 1998 through June 30, 2000. Demographics, utilization, and evidence of seven comorbidities were calculated over a baseline period of 12 months before migraine diagnosis. Costs for patients taking triptan monotherapy during the 12 months after diagnosis were compared to those for patients taking other drug therapies (butalbitals, ergotamines, methysergide, midrin, oral narcotics, and stadol) over the same follow-up period. Ordinary least squares regressions of log healthcare expenditures controlled for demographics, utilization, and comorbidities at baseline. Smearing estimates were used to predict the marginal effect of drug treatment on annual healthcare expenditures. RESULTS: The final sample included 929 patients taking triptan monotherapy and 3,588 patients taking other drug therapies. Triptan patients were more likely to be female than other patients (83.2% vs. 73.5%, p < .001) and less likely to have at least one comorbidity (51% vs. 56%, p=.006) or to visit an emergency room (25% vs. 61%, p < .001); they also had fewer outpatient visits (5.2 vs.7.5, p < .001). Triptan patients had higher predicted costs from migraine-related visits and prescriptions ($4035.88 vs. $450.20, p < .0001), but lower predicted total expenditures ($7468.69 vs. $8974.03, p < .0001), even after controlling for patient differences. CONCLUSIONS: Triptan monotherapy was associated with lower total healthcare expenditures than were other migraine drug therapies, even though migraine-related costs for triptan patients were higher. The difference was over and above the cost influence of health status as measured by comorbidities and prior utilization.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2002-05, ISPOR 2002, Arlington, VA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 5, No. 3 (May/June 2002)

Code

NP4

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×