COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF VACCINATING ADULT CLOSE CONTACTS WITH BOOSTRIX(r)

Author(s)

Kornfield TB1, Botteman MF1, Pashos C2 , 1Abt Associates Clinical Trials, Bethesda, MD, USA; 2Abt Associates Clinical Trials, Cambridge, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Despite widespread childhood immunization, there is a resurgence of pertussis infections and resultant clinical sequelae as adults infect children who are too young to be fully vaccinated or whose immunity is waning. A reduced antigen dTpa booster pertussis vaccine (Boostrix) is now available. The goal of this effort was to evaluate its cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A literature-based model was developed to quantify the clinical and economic costs and benefits of vaccinating parents with Boostrix following the birth of their first child. The model projected and compared the number of adult infections avoided in two hypothetical cohorts (one with and one without vaccination) of one million parent couples over ten years. The model also quantified the number of pediatric infections avoided due to reduced infectivity of vaccinated parents. RESULTS: Immunization with Boostrix led to the following projected discounted benefits: avoidance of 1,178 pediatric and 44,264 adult pertussis infections, 1.3 pediatric encephalopathy cases, 0.4 pediatric chronic brain damage cases, and 1.4 pediatric deaths. Vaccination led to reductions in direct medical interventions, valued at $15.2 million, and prevented lost productivity, valued at $28.9 million, for a total savings of $44.1 million. Including the cost of vaccination of $20.0 million ($10 per adult), the net discounted savings of vaccination was estimated at $24.1 million. The largest cost savings were due to adult outpatient cases avoided (78%) and total (adult and pediatric) hospital stays avoided (13%). The program amounts to a net savings of $12.07 per vaccinee. In univariate sensitivity analyses in which each model input was varied by ±25 percent, the net savings per vaccinee ranged from $5.14 to $18.99. CONCLUSIONS: In this model, vaccinating young parents with Boostrix appears to be a cost-saving preventive measure. Driving this result is the large cost savings attributable to far fewer adult outpatient pertussis cases.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2002-05, ISPOR 2002, Arlington, VA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 5, No. 3 (May/June 2002)

Code

PIN5

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine), Vaccines

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×